Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
To those with poor eyesight perhaps.
To reduce the millions of stars in the constellation of Leo to 9 is akin to reducing the billions of human beings on Earth to the 12 signs of the zodiac.
(It does though fit the pattern of how you view the world around you. Can't see the curvature of the Earth with your own eyes, must be flat. Can't see gra ...[text shortened]... moon, never happened. Can't see the fainter stars in the constellation of Leo,...can only be 9).
My good man
Reveal Hidden Contentor some other phony attempt at sounding friendly and jovial
, you
do realize that science
must contain the element of observation, yes?
Not only that, the results need to be repeatable, correct?
And falsifiable, agreed?
Excellent.
My evidence for a non-globe, possibly-and-most-likely flat earth is based upon such factual verifiable elements.
NASA's lies speak for themselves.
By your way of thinking, there are no constellations, since all of the stars are in the sky, and since we can't exclude some of them, we must include all of them.
From antiquity, Leo has been represented by nine stars.
On the date in question, Venus, Mercury and Mars form a syzygy immediately below the nine prominent stars of Leo, affecting a crown for the Virgo below his outline.
Similar alignments have occurred in the past, all of them repeating other patterns with different players.
Never in human history
this particular alignment.