16 Mar '15 23:39>1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneI made it a point to watch A Space Odyssey when it first showed in theaters and fully expected to be dazzled. But it was mostly a huge disappointment for me... it didn't exactly rock my world to see those bits about the monolith, and the astronaut evolving into an embryo floating in space. I was an impressionable (easily dazzled) teenager, but even so that film came across to me as being pretentious... and I was surprised by my own reaction, because I knew I didn't have the same experience and knowledge as most adults. I was a science and science/fiction fan boy like a lot of boys were, but that grand exalted feeling I was supposed to experience never happened. What I felt instead was just the opposite... I actually felt somewhat embarrassed to be there in that theater.
Compare it with a masterpiece such as Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, and you can see why I called it "crap". Which is amusing, because I see this film was called by some a "satire of 2001".
I think poor production values destroy this film. But this also may be said of many mid-70s films.
I can give some pretentious self indulgence in a film a pass, as long as it's just a little bit and doesn't go on for too long. But in Space Odyssey it just seemed to go on and on and on... like the way propaganda films are designed to target the emotions, and get the viewer to experience some kind of euphoric high. I watched it again a few years ago on TV, and my opinion of that film hasn't changed.
Dark Star on the other hand managed to come across to me like a low budget film that was actually entertaining, but maybe that's just me. They managed to put together a bad (low brow?) film without it actually being all that bad. The 50 Foot Woman and Attack of the Killer Tomatoes were low budget films that were more deserving of being called bad films...
Anyway, as my wife is fond of saying whenever I express my opinion, "There's no accounting for taste." 🙂