07 Aug '15 18:59>
Originally posted by SuzianneI guess that's what the poll meant by 'creationism' (but hey, that's what you get from a quick google search).
I'm guessing that by "creationism" you mean this idea that God just waved his magic wand and stuff just "poofed" into existence on a lazy afternoon because there was nothing else to do.
I believe that God created everything, so does this mean that I believe in "creationism"? I also believe that God used the existing physical laws he made up to create ev ...[text shortened]... time. But I believe that behind it all was God's hand. Does this make me a "creationist" too?
I wouldn't have described you though as a creationist, as mentally this would be to lump you in the same category as Hinds. No, you have a more reasonable argument for the existence of life that 'assimilates' theories such as evolution rather than reacting to them as a direct threat to God's existence (as Hinds would do).
Perhaps, to differentiate, you're a 'longitudinal creationist Borg.'