Pope Issues Personal Apology

Pope Issues Personal Apology

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
18 Sep 06
1 edit

Quoting the following from the NYTimes:
Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,” said Alberto Melloni, professor of history at the University of Modena who has written several books on the Vatican. “It’s never happened as far as I know.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/18/world/europe/18pope.html
(Article available for only a week or so)

While I certainly applaud the Pope for his apology for his comments --
comments I feel were merely poorly considered, not insidious -- does
it strike anyone, Roman Catholics in particular, that apologies are at
the very best rare, and at worst non-existent?

I mean, a figure like the Pope is going to be under a great deal of
public scrutiny, which means his speeches and actions are going to be
under a microscope. Given that he is a man and prone to error, just
like all of the rest of the human race, don't you think that apologies
would be more common? And, unlike political positions like, say, the
idiotic American president, apologies for wrongs committed are part
and parcel of Christian faith. I would think that they ought to be
rather common, no?

Nemesio

Edit: That is, I don't expect the Pope to be apologetic on controversial
issues upon which he has taken a dogmatic stance like abortion or
contraception. However, I would think it would be a demonstration of
Christ-likeness for a religious figurehead to apologize on behalf of
his own actions as well as on behalf of the Church.

What possible explanation can there be for the absence of person
apology in 'recent history' or 'ever?'

t
True X X Xian

The Lord's Army

Joined
18 Jul 04
Moves
8353
18 Sep 06
1 edit

Originally posted by Nemesio
Quoting the following from the NYTimes:
Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be [b]the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,”
said Alberto Melloni, professor ...[text shortened]... rcel of Christian faith. I would think that they ought to be
rather common, no?

Nemesio[/b]
Like maybe sorry about the "no condom" thing?

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by telerion
Like maybe sorry about the "no condom" thing?
Or the whole "we can't resist the temptation to rape your sons" thing?

J

Joined
04 Apr 06
Moves
2969
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by darvlay
Or the whole "we can't resist the temptation to rape your sons" thing?
aw c'mon, if those boys are good chritians, they will forgive those priests!

Ursulakantor

Pittsburgh, PA

Joined
05 Mar 02
Moves
34824
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by Jee
aw c'mon, if those boys are good chritians, they will forgive those priests!
I sincerely hope that this is a tongue-in-cheek comment.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
18 Sep 06
2 edits

Originally posted by Nemesio
Quoting the following from the NYTimes:
Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be [b]the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,”
said Alberto Melloni, professor xplanation can there be for the absence of person
apology in 'recent history' or 'ever?'[/b]
"I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address which were considered offensive.’’

I don't see the old man as apologizing at all. I do see him tweaking the insane terrorist fringe of the Islam world. For all intents and purposes, change a couple of pronouns, and any one of us could have made the same statement.

Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by Nemesio
Quoting the following from the NYTimes:
[i]Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be [b]the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,”
said Alberto Melloni, professor ...[text shortened]... xplanation can there be for the absence of person
apology in 'recent history' or 'ever?'[/b]
He apologized because he probably felt that in the current climate of Muslim fanaticism where a cartoon is grounds for a war he needed to do some damage control.

As I understand it, he was quoting someone who said religion cannot be spread by the sword and that was taken as an insult to Islam. I just wish he had said something like, "Hey, you don't like what I said fine. Welcome to the damn human race. It happens to all of us. You'll get over it."

t
True X X Xian

The Lord's Army

Joined
18 Jul 04
Moves
8353
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
"I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address which were considered offensive.’’

I don't see the old man as apologizing at all. I do see him tweaking the insane terrorist fringe of the Islam world. For all intents and purposes, change a couple of pronouns, and any one of us could have made the same statement.
That's true. It's a "I'm sorry you guys are such crybabies" apology. I'm no fan of the Pope, but if he's sticking it to extremist fundy muslims then more power to him.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
18 Sep 06
1 edit

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
"I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address which were considered offensive.’’

I don't see the old man as apologizing at all. I do see him tweaking the insane terrorist fringe of the Islam world. For all intents and purposes, change a couple of pronouns, and any one of us could have made the same statement.
That's a non-apology; any married man would be familiar with the format which is identical to "I'm sorry that YOU got so upset because I went to the Yankee game on our anniversary".

The giveaway is "which were considered offensive.’’ No actual admission that the remarks were offensive.

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by kirksey957
He apologized because he probably felt that in the current climate of Muslim fanaticism where a cartoon is grounds for a war he needed to do some damage control.

As I understand it, he was quoting someone who said religion cannot be spread by the sword and that was taken as an insult to Islam. I just wish he had said something like, "Hey, you don't ...[text shortened]... said fine. Welcome to the damn human race. It happens to all of us. You'll get over it."
The exact quote that has been cited as offensive was this: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman,".

Hard to see how that wouldn't be considered offensive by any Muslim.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by no1marauder
That's a non-apology; any married man would be familiar with the format which is identical to "I'm sorry that YOU got so upset because I went to the Yankee game on our anniversary".

The giveaway is "which were considered offensive.’’ No actual admission that the remarks were offensive.
It's the 'come-give-us-a-hug' that ends with a crushing of the agrieved's ribs.

Outkast

With White Women

Joined
31 Jul 01
Moves
91452
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by no1marauder
The exact quote that has been cited as offensive was this: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman,".

Hard to see how that wouldn't be considered offensive by any Muslim.
Yea, they say the same thing about everybody else and we tend to go with life.

F

Unknown Territories

Joined
05 Dec 05
Moves
20408
18 Sep 06

Holy wars are just around the corner, it appears. Back to the Dark Ages for all of us. Anybody have a copy of Nivel Shute's "Kindling," by chance?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
18 Sep 06

Originally posted by kirksey957
Yea, they say the same thing about everybody else and we tend to go with life.
(Shrug) There seems to be more complaining by Christians about Muslims being offended by the offensive remarks then by Muslims about the offensive remarks.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
18 Sep 06
1 edit

Originally posted by Nemesio
Quoting the following from the NYTimes:
Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be [b]the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,”
said Alberto Melloni, professor ...[text shortened]... lanation can there be for the absence of person
apology in 'recent history' or 'ever?'[/b]
I don't believe the Pope needed to apologise for his comments. If these prominent Muslims had read his speech they would realise that the Pope was discussing faith and reason which turned into Christian faith and Greek inquiry. The only criticism he made of Islam was that their image of God was one that was totally transcendant and beyond human reason. Hardly the cause for war.

If something awful happens to the Pope as a result of this controversy it would be a loss to Muslims as well as Christians. The Pope probably knows more about Islamic scholarship than most Muslims.