Originally posted by ivanhoe
Sounds more like a shrude politician to me using an ideology which is based on some Christian notions and which he uses as a sticky stick to catch voters.

Originally posted by frogstomp
gave you a rec for that.
that also sums up the "christian" right .

Originally posted by ivanhoe
I see. It seems that quite a lot of "Christian" populist politicians are working on the American political market and call themselves "Evangelists".

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
This is all so very, very strange. Thanks for dunking me in these murky waters.

As for Robertson, he should be sucked by lampreys.

Originally posted by ivanhoe
I see. It seems that quite a lot of "Christian" populist politicians are working on the American political market and call themselves "Evangelists".

Originally posted by kirksey957
Ivanhoe, what is your message from the Lord to Pat Robertson and the like?

Originally posted by kirksey957
Ivanhoe, what is your message from the Lord to Pat Robertson and the like?

Originally posted by ivanhoe
and I would advise them to study the Roman-Catholic interpretation and not to invent their own, based on deception and self-service.

Originally posted by kirksey957
Perhaps I should have put it this way: "What should the magesterium say to this man?"

Originally posted by Nemesio
Why do you opine that the Roman Catholic interpretation is free from deception
and self-service?

Nemesio

I wonder if Pat actually believes what he says or whether he is a total cynic.
I think he's a bit of both; he's probably got himself talked into taking the stance that just about anything is OK as long as it serves "the Cause"

Originally posted by kirksey957
Does Pat Robertson qualify as a terrorist in the same sense as some of the radical clerics who bless jihad?