NZ gay marriage act

You replied:

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sigh such a stance [that robbie carrobie is a closet homosexual] has already been attempted many times and i can g to your art is hardly congruent with the context of your response to that insinuation is it?

so tell the forum, if i can recall the Venus of Urbino to mind, a full female nude, painted by Titian, how am i lusting after other women in the process. That is what you are saying. I did not specify in what capacity i think about the female torso, it was who who have twisted it to make it sexual, because that the kind of mind you have.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
its actually pretty easy not to get hot under the collar in a life-drawing class as nearly all the models ive drawn were not exactly lookers. i can think of only one that was decent. i had more trouble with all the really hot arty-hippy girls in the class.

Indeed, try telling that to divesgeester, i bet he could hardly paint or draw for his boner. In fact, i doubt he should be allowed near a nude model, not with a pretzel factory for a mind.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have been trained in life drawing as well, really, which art school did you attend? and no its not nonsense, its perverts like divesgeester that must put a sexual twist on everything.

a'level art at 6th form, a diploma in fine art at art college in boro and then degree at uni of central lancashire.

you mentioned thinking of women all day as a way of rebuking a claim of another poster that you were a homosexual. if your claim is that your thoughts are not sexual then your claim does not disprove the claim that you are homosexual, which therefore makes your claim of thinking about women all day totally meaningless to the question as you thinking about women is not proof of your sexuality. its just simple logic.

as you did mean it as proof of your heterosexuality then the thoughts had to be sexual, there is no shame in that. most men spend large parts of the day thinking of women and sex.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
a'level art at 6th form, a diploma in fine art at art college in boro and then degree at uni of central lancashire.

you mentioned thinking of women all day as a way of rebuking a claim of another poster that you were a homosexual. if your claim is that your thoughts are not sexual then your claim does not disprove the claim that you are homosexual, w ...[text shortened]... al, there is no shame in that. most men spend large parts of the day thinking of women and sex.

I did not specify in what capacity I thought about them, it was people like you and divesgeester who simply assumed that it must be sexual, because lets face it, your entire lives are a huge assumption, but if it does not prove that I am not gay, then sure, continue to make pretzels in the factories of your mind. Its essentially meaningless to me.

I have a question for you, what is the difference between nude art and pornographic images.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what is this a collage of your life experiences? yesterday i received an unexpected personal message, i will reproduce the sentiments, not verbatim, just so you can get the gist of it,

Why do you put up with these idiots? They are not humble, nor care...I suggest ignore them. I only respond to sensible inquiries, not the lunacy.

it was not from Glaveston.

its quote from the movie trainspotting, the phrase 'choose life' was iconic in the 90's because of the movie (although i may have slightly edited the last line).



Why do you put up with these idiots? They are not humble, nor care...I suggest ignore them. I only respond to sensible inquiries, not the lunacy

was it from god?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
its quote from the movie trainspotting, the phrase 'choose life' was iconic in the 90's because of the movie (although i may have slightly edited the last line).



[b]Why do you put up with these idiots? They are not humble, nor care...I suggest ignore them. I only respond to sensible inquiries, not the lunacy

was it from god?[/b]

I have not seen the film, I would not know. No it was not from God. I choose life i got from Ice age, the animated film, when they are thinking about going through the mountain, the sloth Sid states on the prospect, 'no thanks, i chose life'.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I have not seen the film, I would not know. No it was not from God. I choose life i got from Ice age, the animated film, when they are thinking about going through the mountain, the sloth Sid states on the prospect, 'no thanks, i chose life'.

You chose life? As opposed to what...........?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I did not specify in what capacity I thought about them, it was people like you and divesgeester who simply assumed that it must be sexual, because lets face it, your entire lives are a huge assumption, but if it does not prove that I am not gay, then sure, continue to make pretzels in the factories of your mind. Its essentially meaningless to me.

I have a question for you, what is the difference between nude art and pornographic images.

it doesnt matter that you didnt specify what capacity. extract yourself emotionally from the debate and look at it as pure logic. person a says person b is a homosexual. person b's response is 'i think of woman all day'. if person b's response actually meant 'i think of woman all day in a non sexual way' it becomes meaningless to the original statement of person a.

if your claim is that 'i think of woman all day in a non sexual way' why would this be your response to a claim you are gay?

..............................................................

there isnt always a difference, but in general pornographic images are created for the specific purpose of providing material for sexual arousal. nude art usually isnt meant to stimulate sexual arousal. i would say that there is also pornographic art, it is also possible to say all pornography is art.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You chose life? As opposed to what...........?

pinging a triangle.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
it doesnt matter that you didnt specify what capacity. extract yourself emotionally from the debate and look at it as pure logic. person a says person b is a homosexual. person b's response is 'i think of woman all day'. if person b's response actually meant 'i think of woman all day in a non sexual way' it becomes meaningless to the original statemen that there is also pornographic art, it is also possible to say all pornography is art.

you know, I am going to take my friends advice and simply ignore the lunacy, if you dont mind.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you know, I am going to take my friends advice and simply ignore the lunacy, if you dont mind.

no problem, but we both know it was pure logic not lunacy.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
pinging a triangle.

A lot of Cajuns would object to you dissing the triangle🙂

Originally posted by stellspalfie
no problem, but we both know it was pure logic not lunacy.

yeah, pure logic.

Originally posted by sonhouse
A lot of Cajuns would object to you dissing the triangle🙂

so would some orchestra players no doubt.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yeah, pure logic.

no, the twist caps are usually found in parts of mainland europe and america. britain tends to use tinplated steel crown caps which require a bottle opener.