Nigel Short and the folly of the materialst

Originally posted by finnegan
It need not be a reductionist argument. One of many questions might be to define what we mean by a biological account of anything. When a biologist studies animal behaviour, it is unusual that their work requires a laboratory these days. They are more likely to sit out in the field and carefully observe and classify territorial disputes or mating patterns. ...[text shortened]... theists to fall out when we could be dismantling the monstrous constructs of religious nihilism.

It seems unseemly for two atheists to fall out when we could be dismantling the monstrous constructs of religious nihilism.

and yet for us theists God is not only a reality, its an indestructible one. As the Apostle eloquently stated, no governments nor powers can tear us away from the love that we have found in the Christ. 😀

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It seems unseemly for two atheists to fall out when we could be dismantling the monstrous constructs of religious nihilism.

and yet for us theists God is not only a reality, its an indestructible one. As the Apostle eloquently stated, no governments nor powers can tear us away from the love that we have found in the Christ. 😀

and yet for us theists God is not only a reality, its an indestructible one.

its a bit of a paradox that there are so many indestructible gods in the world.