libido

libido

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
02 Jun 12

if god wanted a man to marry one woman and be together for life, why did he give the man the ability to procreate anytime and a women a few days each month. this system makes man very similar to alpha male animals who mate with multiple partners in a pack or roam around mating with various females spreading his genes.

so what is the reason god decided to make men 'ready' all the time, when it isnt conducive to a happy relationship and leads to so many couples to split up. im not defending men who stray or relationships that break up due to this, but if god wanted man and woman to be happy why didnt he match their libido's. is this an example of poor design.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
02 Jun 12

Sperm war!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_competition

Is that god's idea?!?!?!?

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
250748
02 Jun 12

Originally posted by stellspalfie
if god wanted a man to marry one woman and be together for life, why did he give the man the ability to procreate anytime and a women a few days each month. this system makes man very similar to alpha male animals who mate with multiple partners in a pack or roam around mating with various females spreading his genes.

so what is the reason god decid ...[text shortened]... n and woman to be happy why didnt he match their libido's. is this an example of poor design.
In the early days when there were very few people, a man had many wives.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by Rajk999
In the early days when there were very few people, a man had many wives.
polygamy has nothing to do with how large the population is. it is simply a matter of biology. females are attracted to strong males. strong males get to have more wives and pass on their genes while weak males don't get any .

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
03 Jun 12
2 edits

Originally posted by stellspalfie
, but if god wanted man and woman to be happy why didnt he match their libido's. is this an example of poor design.
Well, gay men in the US account for more than half the AIDS cases in the US, so maybe God knew what he was doing for not giving women as high of a sex drive.

And let's face it, if the sex drive of males did not drive them out of their respective minds would they ever mate and have offspring? 😛

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
polygamy has nothing to do with how large the population is. it is simply a matter of biology. females are attracted to strong males. strong males get to have more wives and pass on their genes while weak males don't get any .
Polygamy is a sin but gay sex is in. -- Jimmy Cockran.

j

Joined
02 Aug 06
Moves
12622
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by stellspalfie
if god wanted a man to marry one woman and be together for life, why did he give the man the ability to procreate anytime and a women a few days each month. this system makes man very similar to alpha male animals who mate with multiple partners in a pack or roam around mating with various females spreading his genes.

so what is the reason god decid ...[text shortened]... n and woman to be happy why didnt he match their libido's. is this an example of poor design.
if god wanted a man to marry one woman and be together for life, why did he give the man the ability to procreate anytime and a women a few days each month. this system makes man very similar to alpha male animals who mate with multiple partners in a pack or roam around mating with various females spreading his genes.

so what is the reason god decided to make men 'ready' all the time, when it isnt conducive to a happy relationship and leads to so many couples to split up. im not defending men who stray or relationships that break up due to this, but if god wanted man and woman to be happy why didnt he match their libido's. is this an example of poor design.


I suspect that after the fall of man, a lot of things just got out of wack. Harmonies got disrupted. Self control was damaged and lost to a great degree.

The good design suffered corruption and damage. This is hinted at in God's word that the earth would now bring forth "thorns and thistles" . Natural things, I think, just got out of kilter.

The natural world did not go altogether to pot. But balance and harmony was damaged and things got warped and distorted.

t

Joined
28 Dec 11
Moves
16268
03 Jun 12

Women are more interested in sex when she is ovulating that's your libido question answered

j

Joined
02 Aug 06
Moves
12622
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by tim88
Women are more interested in sex when she is ovulating that's your libido question answered
A women's sex drive peaks at about 25.

A man's sex drive peaks at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, ...

LOL !

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by tim88
Women are more interested in sex when she is ovulating that's your libido question answered
doesnt really answer the question timmy. why not have a mans libido only active when their partners libido is active. that way a couple are synchronized and problems are avoided. thats what intelligent design would do.

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by jaywill
A women's sex drive peaks at about 25.

A man's sex drive peaks at 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, ...

LOL !
mine peaks at 8:30 am and 8:30 pm.

Joined
16 Jan 07
Moves
95105
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by jaywill
[quote] if god wanted a man to marry one woman and be together for life, why did he give the man the ability to procreate anytime and a women a few days each month. this system makes man very similar to alpha male animals who mate with multiple partners in a pack or roam around mating with various females spreading his genes.

so what is the reason god de ...[text shortened]... ltogether to pot. But balance and harmony was damaged and things got warped and distorted.
the vast majority of male species in the animal world mate with multiple partners to maintain the population. why does man exhibit the same characteristics. to me it shows that we come from the same roots. why would god design man to behave like male animals if he wanted us to act differently. if we have changed because of original sin isnt it a coincidence that we have changed to be exactly like male animals when there is no logical reason for us to be like that.

V

Windsor, Ontario

Joined
10 Jun 11
Moves
3829
03 Jun 12

Originally posted by jaywill
[quote] if god wanted a man to marry one woman and be together for life, why did he give the man the ability to procreate anytime and a women a few days each month. this system makes man very similar to alpha male animals who mate with multiple partners in a pack or roam around mating with various females spreading his genes.

so what is the reason god de ...[text shortened]... ltogether to pot. But balance and harmony was damaged and things got warped and distorted.
so you're saying that god's design got dumber after the fall?

GENS UNA SUMUS

Joined
25 Jun 06
Moves
64930
05 Jun 12

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
so you're saying that god's design got dumber after the fall?
It's intelligent design Jaywill promotes, not intelligent engineering. There's trouble on the factory floor. As for marketing, it's a total mess. Sales are down.

j

Joined
02 Aug 06
Moves
12622
05 Jun 12

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
polygamy has nothing to do with how large the population is. it is simply a matter of biology. females are attracted to strong males. strong males get to have more wives and pass on their genes while weak males don't get any .
polygamy has nothing to do with how large the population is. it is simply a matter of biology. females are attracted to strong males. strong males get to have more wives and pass on their genes while weak males don't get any .


If women are smart they would not regard a man who cannot be commited to them faithfully as "strong". Such a man who cannot remain faithful to his one wife should be regarded as "weak".