21 Aug '17 09:19>11 edits
Originally posted by @divegeesterAs calm and unflappable as your posture is your arguments are not correspondingly effective.
You're just angry sonship.
This is discussion forum and protocol and basic honesty dictates that posters give credit to their sourses, you never do. You like to reflect the ideas of others as though they were your own. I don't like this, I think it is dishonest. I also disagree with many of your very strange beliefs and call you out over them.
I ...[text shortened]... rum then I suggest, as has been suggest many many times before, that you start a blog somewhere.
On the trinity - weak arguments from you.
On annhilation - weak arguments from you there too.
You posture yourself like you object and, I can't STAND people's disagreement.
Oh, I can take disagreement in spades.
I am not impressed with disagreements not backed with better reasons but instead advice to go start a blog.
As for the things I seek to minister here not being mine?
They are mine, Some expressions which I find useful just may not have all originated from me.
As for not giving credit to influences?
That is simply a lie.
As for reflecting the ideas of others?
You not liking it doesn't account for much more than your likes and dislikes.
If you HAD a legitimate case about me stealing others' writings to make them appear original it is strange that you have not yet accepted the offer to formally complain to whatever original publishers about it.
In short there is nothing much more here than your personal dislike for some posters' style. A style which you dishonestly claim is plagiarism when I constantly provide source links - SO THAT PEOPLE CAN GO AND READ MORE - Duh.
Now the emotional part,
I forgive you but I don't think I will discuss anything more with you.
Don't over play the mad issue.
Anything personal is forgiven.
But "Go off and start a blog" doesn't do the job for you as would well reasoned interpretations which effectively counter the "strange" ideas you don't agree with.
"Go off and start your blog" is not an effective substitute for better arguments on the three-oneness of God. Nor is that advice an effective demonstration of saving your weak arguments on annhilationism.
The most important thing that the record needs to be made clear about is this:
Sounding LIKE other ministers of the word of God is no crime in and of itself.
You mean to cause me to feel bad about it.
I feel great about it - backfire on you.
And I WANT people to go and READ MORE from the sources that I sound like or quote.
You don't seem to get this obvious clue.
Rather than conceal sources of some influence I ENCOURAGE readers to check out MORE those sources.
Here it goes again.
Great reading and teaching at www.ministrybooks.org