Originally posted by Suzianne
Would you (or maybe I mean could you) define "evil" as a lack of morality? Or is your position that a lack of morality isn't necessarily "evil"?
I am not sure that the two map.
You could have a person with great moral understanding, who then
intentionally did things that contravened their moral understanding.
So they absolutely knew what they were doing was wrong and why.
I might argue that that person was more evil than a person with no
understanding of morality who did things that were harmful but that
didn't understand that their actions were wrong.
A hurricane has no morals but it isn't evil when it kills people.
I might even argue that for a being to be evil they must have a knowledge
of morality so that they know their actions are wrong and do them anyway.
Although it might not feel a lot different to be on the receiving end of the
harmful action I think that for the actor to be evil they must understand
morality.
So it probably depends on quite what you are asking.