14 Sep 16
Originally posted by Rajk999So......you know my situation?
You moron. That man was beaten and robbed.
You are not that.
You are a weak man that has turned to evil to satisfy the desires of the flesh.
What you have sown, that you now reap.
You are commenting like a moron yourself without knowing?
You are a very bad person Rak, and have NO clue about Jesus.
You Rak are a moron, and the Samaritan story shows why. You are a person who judges others, how do you know another man's problems?
Moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
14 Sep 16
Originally posted by chaney3You have paraded and boasted of your personal bad situation on this forum.
So......you know my situation?
You are commenting like a moron yourself without knowing?
You are a very bad person Rak, and have NO clue about Jesus.
You Rak are a moron, and the Samaritan story shows why. You are a person who judges others, how do you know another man's problems?
Moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That is public knowledge.
Now you blame God. Obviously you are one of those who blame everyone else for their woes - parents, friends, employers. Its always someone elses fault but yours.
So from down in the gutter where you choose to be, through no fault but your own, you can call me whatever names you like. My advice to you is sound and scriptural - read Proverbs and Ecclestiaties - get off you lazy butt and do something constructive to fix your problems. Laziness and blaming the world for your ills is a sin.
-
14 Sep 16
Originally posted by chaney3In fairness sir, you have shared your situation quite openly in other threads, especially your struggles with alcohol.
So......you know my situation?
You are commenting like a moron yourself without knowing?
You are a very bad person Rak, and have NO clue about Jesus.
You Rak are a moron, and the Samaritan story shows why. You are a person who judges others, how do you know another man's problems?
Moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Blaming God for our own choices does seem a little odd.
Originally posted by Rajk999And that's my point idiot!!!
You have paraded and boasted of your personal bad situation on this forum.
That is public knowledge.
Now you blame God. Obviously you are one of those who blame everyone else for their woes - parents, friends, employers. Its always someone elses fault but yours.
So from down in the gutter where you choose to be, through no fault but your own, you can ca ...[text shortened]... tructive to fix your problems. Laziness and blaming the world for your ills is a sin.
-
The Samaritan could have said the same thing to the guy on the road. But he didn't, he helped him.
So, in Rak's mind....the Samaritan was an assshole, he should have lectured the man about laziness and keeping guard.
You Rak, are a moron!! And a failure of Christ.
14 Sep 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeBogus point Ghost, in this context.
In fairness sir, you have shared your situation quite openly in other threads, especially your struggles with alcohol.
Blaming God for our own choices does seem a little odd.
Rak would have lectured the guy on the road, and not helped him.
14 Sep 16
Originally posted by chaney3So you think a Good Christian will come down to your level in the gutter and side with you blaming God.
And that's my point idiot!!!
The Samaritan could have said the same thing to the guy on the road. But he didn't, he helped him.
So, in Rak's mind....the Samaritan was an assshole, he should have lectured the man about laziness and keeping guard.
You Rak, are a moron!! And a failure of Christ.
There is only on failure in this thread and its the guy that started it.
Originally posted by chaney3Rajk has posted numerous times about the importance of 'actions' rather than 'words.'
Bogus point Ghost, in this context.
Rak would have lectured the guy on the road, and not helped him.
It therefore logically follows he would have helped the fellow (a victim of a crime) rather than giving him a lecture. I think you know that.
14 Sep 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeThe dilemma is not if he would help. But Rak indicates that the help is with a clause:
Rajk has posted numerous times about the importance of 'actions' rather than 'words.'
It therefore logically follows he would have helped the Samaritan (a victim of a crime) rather than giving him a lecture. I think you know that.
Is your situation of your own doing?