31 Jul '05 09:30>
I think we are up against a dysfunctionally simplex theory here. It's frozen in a stone age world view and that's all there is to it.
It's a shame really.
It's a shame really.
Originally posted by frogstompYou seem to have some blinders on here, a “...dysfunctionally
I think we are up against a dysfunctionally simplex theory here. It's frozen in a stone age world view and that's all there is to it.
It's a shame really.
Originally posted by KellyJayThere are other possible explanations, Kelly, the bible god as described in the OT, having been borrowed from the earlier Sumerian civilization , just isn't one of them.
You seem to have some blinders on here, a “...dysfunctionally
simplex theory?" It is within the realm of possible explanations,
be it because God did it or not.
Having a view based on modern speculation can be just wrong
too, and just as frozen as a view that would keep you from seeing
something else that may be true. One of the main troubles with
...[text shortened]... me used to looking for evolutionary
rational for life, you see it if it is there or not.
Kelly
Originally posted by frogstompYea, I'm quite sure we could come up with several different
There are other possible explanations, Kelly, the bible god as described in the OT, having been borrowed from the earlier Sumerian civilization , just isn't one of them.