16 Dec '13 20:50>
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThe last time this topic came up, it was painfully clear that you had zero familiarity with any of the literature on proposed accounts for the evolutionary etiology of religiosity despite the fact that you basically claimed to have read all such accounts and found them wanting. If you were just ignorant on the topic, that would be perfectly fine with me; but the lesson from history is that you are disingenuous on this topic. So, I hope the other posters all take heed here: discussing this with you here is a waste of time, until such time as you can demonstrate you have actually done the homework you claim you have done on the topic.
In a previous thread, the idea was offered how man's penchant for religion could be explained in evolutionary terms, i.e., there existed some evolutionary benefit to the development of religion--- even if such benefits have since expired.
This position[hidden]really, anything related to evolution-as-a-guiding force[/hidden] leads to a few unresolved que ...[text shortened]... many of them are physical in nature in comparison to the amount which were conceptual in nature?