Originally posted by karoly aczeli dunno, it was Tom Cruise, who as an actor i am not really fond of, but he did ok. W/T graphic artists are ok, they have their moments. Actually great care is made to ensure that they are as accurate as possible, sometimes, as was the case of rendering Babylon, an entire model of the city was made and then the views were projected from that model. (it was argued that the Ziggurat in the centre might not have been visible from the river banks, but the model demonstrated that it was. 🙂
There's a new one, right?
Y'know I love those watchtower mags for their artwork.
Meteorites plundering into the side of the Earth. Good stuff.
I mite make a collage today.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is indeed a disturbing universe.
i dunno, it was Tom Cruise, who as an actor i am not really fond of, but he did ok. W/T graphic artists are ok, they have their moments. Actually great care is made to ensure that they are as accurate as possible, sometimes, as was the case of rendering Babylon, an entire model of the city was made and then the views were projected from that model. ...[text shortened]... tre might not have been visible from the river banks, but the model demonstrated that it was. 🙂
I find myself agreeing with you too much lately,(barring your stance on womens roles), you sure you haven't been kicked out of the JW's and aren't telling us?
Originally posted by RJHindsWell my advice then it not to take the word of people who refuse to publish their work, or do so only in an environment which avoids criticism. I can assure you that no such proof has been presented to the scientific community via the normal channels.
I took their word for it.
So you are the ones that should be trying to come up with proof to
prove their proofs are in error.
Yes I probably would if any such proofs were forth coming.
So far all we have is your word for it that some unnamed 'scientist' have proofs. We don't know who they are or what their proofs consist of. You don't even know what their proofs consist of. I am starting to doubt that you even know who they are.
So. Do you have any references, or did you make it all up?
Originally posted by menace71I think a better naturalistic explanation is that life is fine tuned to conditions, rather than conditions fine tuned to life, and there is a naturalistic process for it if you look at it this way. And life can get by in a rather wide range of conditions. After all, the 20% oxygen atmosphere of Earth was generated by as a byproduct of photosynthesis.
I know it seems self centered but I would argue odds in the case of a fine tuned universe. (Life more than just human life also) In just this solar system alone and earth in general. Right atmosphere balanced having a moon at the right distance and tides. Sun right distance from earth. (BTW I think it total plausible for these conditions to be somewhere els ...[text shortened]... and for life in general. Rotational speed of the earth right and helps create weather.
Manny
Originally posted by menace71It "seems self-centered" because it is.
I know it seems self centered but I would argue odds in the case of a fine tuned universe. (Life more than just human life also) In just this solar system alone and earth in general. Right atmosphere balanced having a moon at the right distance and tides. Sun right distance from earth. (BTW I think it total plausible for these conditions to be somewhere els ...[text shortened]... and for life in general. Rotational speed of the earth right and helps create weather.
Manny
Try this thought experiment:
Imagine thousands of solar systems similar to our own with each one having life on the third planet and each one with differences in the parameters that you listed. In each one the life may be different than what exists here because of those differences. Should the life forms on each planet marvel at how "fine tuned" the conditions are for their own existence? Those that do, would only do so if they cannot see beyond themselves.
Originally posted by sonhouseI found something on this multiverse idea.
So for you it's a matter of unsubstantiated faith.
I don't understand why theists, mostly fundies, hate the idea of the multiverse.
If your god is infinite, then why can't it rule over an infinite universe?
What's the problem here?
Just the idea you think only atheists believe it?
If atheists like it, fundies hate it no matter what the truth?
&NR=1
Originally posted by karoly aczelI agree with you.....were so busy arguing about God that we lose sight of just living 🙂
I agree.
i was walking on the bea....anyway i saw all these people walking their dogs.
And i thought maybe we're like pets for the aliens. (This idea has been postulated by Perry Farrell in his song "pets"😉.
I'm thinking these "aliens" are in unseen dimension trying to breed better humans.
Y'know a dog looks at you like it understands and it w ...[text shortened]... mans? will it end? Why do people crap on about god? Why do people believe in a devil?
LOL We could be a speck of lint on God's left nut ya know (Sorry for being sacrilegious)
Manny
Originally posted by menace71I wonder how many light years long this god is? Is she bigger than the known universe?
I agree with you.....were so busy arguing about God that we lose sight of just living 🙂
LOL We could be a speck of lint on God's left nut ya know (Sorry for being sacrilegious)
Manny
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneLet alone planets with binary star systems 😉
It "seems self-centered" because it is.
Try this thought experiment:
Imagine thousands of solar systems similar to our own with each one having life on the third planet and each one with differences in the parameters that you listed. In each one the life may be different than what exists here because of those differences. Should the life forms on each ...[text shortened]... r their own existence? Those that do, would only do so if they cannot see beyond themselves.
Originally posted by menace71There is no need to EVER apologize to me, my good sir. Your posting history shows you are a decent chap and I always appreciate your well thought out, well trimmed ;], posts.
I agree with you.....were so busy arguing about God that we lose sight of just living 🙂
LOL We could be a speck of lint on God's left nut ya know (Sorry for being sacrilegious)
Manny
"just living" is harder than it sounds. Consider how much of a 16-18 hour waking day we spend thinking,(and subsequently sometimes speaking or acting out), about unecessary ,and dare I say, ignorant thoughts each day. I know this guy that lives on 30cents a day. Thats a reflection on his thinking.
We shouldn't try to compare orselves to any other people, no matter how awesome they are because thier awesomeness is BECAUSE they dont copy anyone else.
We all scratch around in the dark each day and we all (well nearly all the posters on here anyway), obviously have access to computers,education, healthy food and other things that would make this world good enough to want to bring more children into it.
Each day we (all the posters here) can contribute in our own little way by making the world like the way it is for us. And if we "simply live" and make even the smallest observation about "truth", we must remember this!!! It's important because YOU have witnessed it and therefor, (As long as you are honest with yourself, which the little angel on your shoulder tells you (before the mean little devil guy on your other shoulder says something else) [always go with your first thought-dont hesitate],) ...therefor I see no obstacles* into leaving this world in a healthier state in general than what it was like when we were born into it.
*the only obstacles we have are power concerns and the supposed lack of technology to make clean power. The answers are out there and have been suppressed by some "powers". (see the thread on Nikola Tesla)