07 Jun 15
Originally posted by RJHindsSo you have finally accepted the concept that life origins is a separate science from evolution? That's a significant step if true.
So we have determined that evolution is a process without intelligence and evolution is not the process that created life.
So what is it about this process that allows it to change what we call simpe life that it could not create to more complex forms of life?
07 Jun 15
Originally posted by sonhouseThere is no SCIENCE of life origins. That is what I accept. There is no SCIENCE of evolution is what I am trying to get you to accept. The theory of evolution is not SCIENCE, but instead it is religious speculation of humanistic atheism.
So you have finally accepted the concept that life origins is a separate science from evolution? That's a significant step if true.
http://atheismexposed.tripod.com/humanistic_atheism.htm
07 Jun 15
Originally posted by RJHindsFortunately you are not the czar of science so that definition is left to REAL people not trolls like you. To you, the Uray-miller experiment is just guesses I suppose.
There is no SCIENCE of life origins. That is what I accept. There is no SCIENCE of evolution is what I am trying to get you to accept. The theory of evolution is not SCIENCE, but instead it is religious speculation of humanistic atheism.
http://atheismexposed.tripod.com/humanistic_atheism.htm
08 Jun 15
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd you figure someone trying to duplicate those results would find after 2 months running or whatever the time was, you would find nothing in the way of complex molecules. So what result did YOU have running the Miller experiment?
The Uray-miller experiment was a cleverly devised fraud to decieve the unscientific mind. 😏
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN1_4mMI-oU
Myself, I actually did something like that experiment when I was 14 and indeed found complex chemicals generated. What did YOU find in your experiment?
08 Jun 15
Originally posted by sonhouseJust GOO and it never got to the ZOO or to YOU.
And you figure someone trying to duplicate those results would find after 2 months running or whatever the time was, you would find nothing in the way of complex molecules. So what result did YOU have running the Miller experiment?
Myself, I actually did something like that experiment when I was 14 and indeed found complex chemicals generated. What did YOU find in your experiment?
09 Jun 15
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsWow, there for one second I thought you had actually come up with an original phrase. BTW, the Miller experiment and the Jennings experiment did not produce much more than goo, neither one was SUPPOSED to produce anything more than goo, just more complex goo. So once again, your hyper arrogant assshole buddy is thinking he will win converts by just making fun of science. You are getting more and more desperate to make some kind of point but none of those video's do you or anyone else credit. You seem to be digging yourself deeper and deeper into darkness away from the light.
Just GOO and it never got to the ZOO or to YOU.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikMasuh5Ntw
09 Jun 15
Originally posted by sonhouseI actually I am bring the frauds and lies of the theory of evolution out int the light so that those who still have eyes to see can see that evolution is a lie of Satan.
Wow, there for one second I thought you had actually come up with an original phrase. BTW, the Miller experiment and the Jennings experiment did not produce much more than goo, neither one was SUPPOSED to produce anything more than goo, just more complex goo. So once again, your hyper arrogant assshole buddy is thinking he will win converts by just making f ...[text shortened]... lse credit. You seem to be digging yourself deeper and deeper into darkness away from the light.
10 Jun 15
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYou still haven't told me the results of YOUR miller type experiment. I told you of mine, done when I was 14 and didn't even know about the Miller one. What was YOUR result?
I actually I am bring the frauds and lies of the theory of evolution out int the light so that those who still have eyes to see can see that evolution is a lie of Satan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ4iORFL_Jk
Was it false science that more complex goo developed from those basic chemicals inside the jar? Did Miller just sneak in in the middle of the night and squirt in some molasses, something like that? That energy added to simple chemicals NEVER results in more complex molecules? Is that your position? Will you refuse to answer that also?
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by sonhouseI never wasted my time with such nonsense. I was not fool enough to believe I was as intelligent as God. 😏
You still haven't told me the results of YOUR miller type experiment. I told you of mine, done when I was 14 and didn't even know about the Miller one. What was YOUR result?
Was it false science that more complex goo developed from those basic chemicals inside the jar? Did Miller just sneak in in the middle of the night and squirt in some molasses, somet ...[text shortened]... R results in more complex molecules? Is that your position? Will you refuse to answer that also?
11 Jun 15
Originally posted by RJHindsSo the gist of your statement is science is nonsense. Just asking the question 'does energy plus simple chemicals cause an increase in the complexity of the original chemical' is just nonsense and nobody should be so stupid as to even ask that question much less carry out the experiment that Miller did.
I never wasted my time with such nonsense. I was not fool enough to believe I was as intelligent as God. 😏
11 Jun 15
2 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseI am saying I am not fool enough to think I can create a cell containing DNA and program it with information to make a living creature. It is nonsense for anyone to think they can. And it certainly isn't going to happen by the accident of evolution or whatever. 😏
So the gist of your statement is science is nonsense. Just asking the question 'does energy plus simple chemicals cause an increase in the complexity of the original chemical' is just nonsense and nobody should be so stupid as to even ask that question much less carry out the experiment that Miller did.