15 Mar 12
Originally posted by humyYour proof is not actual, but imaginary. 😏
“...who claim the theory of evolution is fact ...”
-which is is. We have the physical proof; we have the fossils; we have the missing link (both as some as fossils and some currently living ones) we have the geological evidence; we have the genetic evidence; we have the evidence of micro-evolution occurring today and the data to prove that macro-evolution ha ...[text shortened]... daptation as evolution. ...”
“genetic adaptation by means of natural selection” = “evolution”
15 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsSo it sounds like you agree with Santorum, you want the Iranization of the US and shut down of stem cell research and the like. You want the US to fall behind the rest of the world instead of leading it in science.
Evolutionary scientists (Pseudo-scientists) fudge on the scientific method to
suit their beliefs. The end does not justify the means in science. There opinions
are neither science or fact. Santorum is a politician and does not speak the views
of all Christians. But he has a right to his opinion just as you do. But that has
nothing to do with true science. As I have said before opinion is not science.
You cannot both claim to be not anti science and to call some sciences pseudo sciences or some such since all modern sciences use the same scientific method.
15 Mar 12
Originally posted by sonhouseApparently, you have not read other things I have wriiten on Santorum. I
So it sounds like you agree with Santorum, you want the Iranization of the US and shut down of stem cell research and the like. You want the US to fall behind the rest of the world instead of leading it in science.
You cannot both claim to be not anti science and to call some sciences pseudo sciences or some such since all modern sciences use the same scientific method.
have said I am for Ron Paul. I posted some things Ron Paul said about
Santorum. Do you even know Ron Paul's views on anything?
15 Mar 12
3 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat did he say about Santorum? As a democrat, I haven't been exactly keen to follow all the republican stuff except to hope Santorum is the repub. candidate🙂 Or better yet, Rush Limberger🙂
Apparently, you have not read other things I have wriiten on Santorum. I
have said I am for Ron Paul. I posted some things Ron Paul said about
Santorum. Do you even know Ron Paul's views on anything?
15 Mar 12
Originally posted by sonhouse
What did he say about Santorum? As a democrat, I haven't been exactly keen to follow all the republican stuff except to hope Santorum is the repub. candidate🙂 Or better yet, Rush Limberger🙂
&feature=related
&feature=related
&feature=related
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
http://www.ronpaul.com/
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
15 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsWhy do you support someone who has no chance to win? If you are a loyal republican, shouldn't you be putting your weight behind someone with a chance to win?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZPexbzJUU4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4gcnPm0SxQ&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fx4tGWHPFg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi12aVa3psc&feature=related
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
http://www.ronpaul.com/
http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
16 Mar 12
Originally posted by sonhouseThere is plenty of time for that. Now I am putting in my protest vote so that
Why do you support someone who has no chance to win? If you are a loyal republican, shouldn't you be putting your weight behind someone with a chance to win?
maybe the party leaders will realize they need some readjustment.
16 Mar 12
Take it to debates or wherever, you want to make a change, you start with your own 2 hands and your brain.
A protest vote, but still republican. Yeah right. I really dont want to hear about it.
Your leadership system is a joke, that would be a good start in this forum. If you really take it seriously, Ron, (that's not of "McDonald" fame is it?) , then take it elsewhere. Ergh! This place is bad enough without starting on US politics.
16 Mar 12
Originally posted by karoly aczelYeah, we got a bit sidetracked.
Take it to debates or wherever, you want to make a change, you start with your own 2 hands and your brain.
A protest vote, but still republican. Yeah right. I really dont want to hear about it.
Your leadership system is a joke, that would be a good start in this forum. If you really take it seriously, Ron, (that's not of "McDonald" fame is it?) , then take it elsewhere. Ergh! This place is bad enough without starting on US politics.
Originally posted by karoly aczelI have discarded the Democrats along time ago. That party is too far gone and
Take it to debates or wherever, you want to make a change, you start with your own 2 hands and your brain.
A protest vote, but still republican. Yeah right. I really dont want to hear about it.
Your leadership system is a joke, that would be a good start in this forum. If you really take it seriously, Ron, (that's not of "McDonald" fame is it?) , then take it elsewhere. Ergh! This place is bad enough without starting on US politics.
I see no hope for it. I do not want the kind of government the Democrats are
promising. The Repblicans we elect do not keeping all their promises after being
elected, as Ron Paul has pointed out. This makes them almost as bad as the
Democrats because they do little to counter the bad policies of the Demopcrats.
Since we have such a strong two party system, the only hope I see is to change
the Republican Party platform and to elect Republicans that will stick to it.
P.S. The people of this country must come to realize that trying to spend our
way out of debt with so-called stimulus packages is stupid regardless of which
political party wants to do it.
16 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsadd economics to the list of things you don't understand. no country (or state) has ever cut spending into prosperity.
P.S. The people of this country must come to realize that trying to spend our
way out of debt with so-called stimulus packages is stupid regardless of which
political party wants to do it.
16 Mar 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritHow about cutting taxes into prosperity. That worked for awhile until the big
add economics to the list of things you don't understand. no country (or state) has ever cut spending into prosperity.
spenders decided to pass spending bill after spending bill and then spend more
money rebuilding a country we destroyed and then not even taking any of their
oil as repayment. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
16 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsWell this should be in debates but the ones who can't balance the budget in America are the
How about cutting taxes into prosperity. That worked for awhile until the big
spenders decided to pass spending bill after spending bill and then spend more
money rebuilding a country we destroyed and then not even taking any of their
oil as repayment. Stupid, stupid, stupid.
republicans not the democrats.
This is factual data you can look it up.
Your national deficit has increased most and fastest under republican control vs democratic control.
The big spenders you are talking about are republicans, not democrats.
And you are right...
They are stupid.
16 Mar 12
Originally posted by googlefudgeIt was a Repblican controlled congress that fought against Bill Clinton in order
Well this should be in debates but the ones who can't balance the budget in America are the
republicans not the democrats.
This is factual data you can look it up.
Your national deficit has increased most and fastest under republican control vs democratic control.
The big spenders you are talking about are republicans, not democrats.
And you are right...
They are stupid.
to finally agree on a balanced Federal budget. The Democrats do not have the
reputation for big government and big spending for nothing.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/no-democrat-controlled-congress-has-balanced-federal-budget-40-years-no-republican
17 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsGeez man, you just dont know when to stop, take a leaf out of sonhouses book, eh?
I have discarded the Democrats along time ago. That party is too far gone and
I see no hope for it. I do not want the kind of government the Democrats are
promising. The Repblicans we elect do not keeping all their promises after being
elected, as Ron Paul has pointed out. This makes them almost as bad as the
Democrats because they do little to count ...[text shortened]... with so-called stimulus packages is stupid regardless of which
political party wants to do it.
Do you think I give a dam? because you were answering me, weirdo...