Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeExactly. From what I can tell, that's what's keeping you and JW from admitting that you're wrong.
Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.
Proverbs 16:18
Which is the source of the RC-like laughable antics exhibited by you on this thread and JW on this thread as well as the "Grace and Truth" thread in your attempts to avoid admitting it.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneAre you ever wrong sir?
Exactly. From what I can tell, that's what's keeping you and JW from admitting that you're wrong.
Which is the source of the RC-like laughable antics exhibited by you on this thread and JW on this thread as well as the "Grace and Truth" thread in your attempts to avoid admitting it.
Please link me to the thread where you have admitted so, or to the source that confirms your infallibility.
Originally posted by sonship[b]Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall.
Proverbs 16:18
Really ?
Pride goes before a destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall ?
Is there a way we can escape from our fierce pride ?[/b]Was hesitant to quote the bible, in case you suddenly popped up.
😉
28 Jun 16
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeWhat's at issue is that you've been repeatedly and so blatantly wrong on this thread.
Are you ever wrong sir?
Please link me to the thread where you have admitted so, or to the source that confirms your infallibility.
That and the RC-like laughable antics exhibited by you in your attempts to avoid admitting it.
This is yet another lame attempt at avoidance.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneYou've failed miserably to show where I have been wrong. My OP is still there to be seen by anyone interested in your nonsense. You misunderstood my use of terminology (paid the price) and overlooked my reference to Jesus and his atonement (which clearly evidences that you'd made a misunderstanding), which you then claimed I had only stated in a later post, as if to cover a contradiction, despite it clearly being there in my very first post..
What's at issue is that you've been repeatedly and so blatantly wrong on this thread.
That and the RC-like laughable antics exhibited by you in your attempts to avoid admitting it.
This is yet another lame attempt at avoidance.
It's rather amusing how you are flapping around determined not to admit you made a mistake of your own.
The notion in my OP was of man being born into sin due to the original sin of Adam. (Man was dealing with the consequences of this original sin, had paid the price for it, reaped what had been sown). This sin had been atoned for by the death of Christ on the cross. - Where in this is the contradiction or wrongness of which you speak? It is all there in the OP. No later correction was necessary.
I look forward to your apology.
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeWhy should they stop at your OP? While your oafish attempts in the OP are amusing, the real gold is in the sheer buffoonery in the idiotic and contradictory claims you make trying to explain yourself in subsequent posts.
You've failed miserably to show where I have been wrong. My OP is still there to be seen by anyone interested in your nonsense. You misunderstood my use of terminology (paid the price) and overlooked my reference to Jesus and his atonement (which clearly evidences that you'd made a misunderstanding), which you then claimed I had only stated in a late ...[text shortened]... It is all there in the OP. No later correction was necessary.
I look forward to your apology.
Your latest post is a fine addition. Keep them coming.
Originally posted by ThinkOfOneYour lack of attempt to address the points made in my post are noted. (And telling).
Why should they stop at your OP? While your oafish attempts in the OP are amusing, the real gold is in the sheer buffoonery in the idiotic and contradictory claims you make trying to explain yourself in subsequent posts.
Your latest post is a fine addition. Keep them coming.
This dialogue is all about you misunderstanding an expression, overlooking something that was already there in the OP and then being too cowardly to acknowledge it. All you can do is speak of contradictions without explaining what those contradictions are.
You really do need to develop a more grown up approach to forums. If you are confused by something someone has posted, by all means raise it with them. When they clarify what they meant 'accept that clarification' and move on; rather than pounce on that clarification as contradiction and feel like you have somehow won something of value. All you actually win is a thread derailment and an accumulation of people who think you are a lowly troll like creature only here to be confrontational.