Can you give us a synopsis of the video, what are Dr J's main points of contention?
It seemed to be a up-to-date state of proposed evidences for TOE. The science teacher explains how pack-peddling, revisionism, face saving, and euphemism are being offered about the ongoing collapse of past icons of evidence.
I plan to watch the entire video a second time.
I can't stomach watching a 55min presentation from a man who thinks the world's age is a few thousand years.
Then take it in little chunks of maybe 10 minutes each. I think the first six minutes you could skip if you wish.
YouTube
Sometimes you cannot dismiss people as total crackpots just because of some things. I think people with contrary views sometimes have SOME things which deserve my ear.
There are debates with Christian apologists in which counter points are made by opponents to my faith, which I think are worth consideration if not their entire argument.
While you're at it you didn't answer these questions yesterday - So even though evolution is 'collapsing' you still think it should be taught in school's?
I am not into policy about public education. But I think that the current major consensus theories should be presented along with honest disclosures about their problems.
That is teaching critical thinking and education, I think. The hope is that young minds will grow up and go further in learning and solve some of the problems for us.
Why not teach TOE and also teach serious challenges to it in the realm of evidence ?
I mean, either life evolved or it didn't right? What's your take on how life began and how it diversified? Or do you think life was created as it is?
So we say "We don't know for sure, but here are the current consensus theories. And here are some objections to them. We're hoping some of you young minds will grow up and solve some of these problems for us in the future."
I think that is education.