30 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneAnd it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
[b]It appears you are twisting his words somewhat to fit your own agenda. (Nothing new there).
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I plainly stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"[/b]
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeAs he often does, GoaD is only interested in "stirring the pot". He's been one of the most deceitful posters on this forum pretty much since he started posting here and often stoops to deceit in his efforts to troll.
And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
30 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneAs he often does, Thinkofone will start talking in the third person when out-argued.
As he often does, GoaD is only interested in "stirring the pot". He's been one of the most deceitful posters on this forum pretty much since he started posting here and often stoops to deceit in his efforts to troll.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeMore deceit on the part of GoaD in his efforts to troll. Nothing new here.
As he often does, Thinkofone will start talking in the third person when out-argued.
He started as a troll. He continues as a troll. See the following thread for an example of his early efforts.
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/john-858.164426
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to show that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
30 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneTime on your hands this evening, hey?
More deceit on the part of GoaD in his efforts to troll. Nothing new here.
He started as a troll. He continues as a troll. See the following thread for an example of his early efforts.
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/john-858.164426
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to prove that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
On the topic of deceit, do you actually believe in God? Yes or no?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeGoaD started as a troll. He continues as a troll. See the following thread for an example of his early efforts.
Time on your hands this evening, hey?
On the topic of deceit, do you actually believe in God? Yes or no?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/john-858.164426
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to show that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
Originally posted by @thinkofoneOn the topic of deceit, do you actually believe in God? Yes or no?
GoaD started as a troll. He continues as a troll. See the following thread for an example of his early efforts.
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/john-858.164426
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to show that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeGoaD started as a troll. He continues as a troll. See the following thread for an example of his early efforts.
On the topic of deceit, do you actually believe in God? Yes or no?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/john-858.164426
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to show that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
30 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofoneLook at you, trying your utmost to distract away from these questions, relevant to the OP.
GoaD started as a troll. He continues as a troll. See the following thread for an example of his early efforts.
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/john-858.164426
He started of with the following comment:
"As a neutral observer, i think Joseph is winning this argument."
And then went on to show that he was anything but a "neutral observer".
And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe following thread is another early example of GoaD's trolling. Note how his posts were in an effort to "stir the pot".
Look at you, trying your utmost to distract away from these questions, relevant to the OP.
And it is my assertion sir that you are plainly wrong. Why have you mischievously replaced his 'logic' with 'thinking?' Do you consider the two identical?
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/salvation.165585
This is nothing new from GoaD.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneWhy do you always go off topic when faced with questions you can't answer?
The following thread is another early example of GoaD's trolling. Note how his posts were in an effort to "stir the pot".
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/salvation.165585
This is nothing new from GoaD.
Is it an insecurity thing?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeGoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
Why do you always go off topic when faced with questions you can't answer?
Is it an insecurity thing?
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I plainly stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"[/b]
Originally posted by @thinkofone[/b]Go on, have another go:
GoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I p ...[text shortened]... stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeGoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
Go on, have another go:
People of faith may indeed not be able to explain God in a logical sense that would satisfy a finite mind, but that is not the same as saying faith has nothing to do with thinking.
Is it?
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I plainly stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"[/b]
30 Mar 18
Originally posted by @thinkofone[/b]I asked you a perfectly valid question. I'm sorry you feel unable to answer it.
GoaD's first post addressed to me was in an effort to troll and his trolling continues. That he's pretending to have always been on-topic is just part and parcel of his efforts to "stir the pot".
As I posted in my first response to GoaD:
The reality is that you're twisting what I wrote to fit YOUR own agenda. (Nothing new there).
As I p ...[text shortened]... stated:
"Mchill's point seems to be that 'faith' has nothing to do with thinking"
My first post to you was to highlight you had misrepresented another poster, to fit your own agenda of theists being unable to think for themselves and only regurgitate dogma. If there was indeed trolling in the thread, it was because you introduced it.