13 Mar '19 01:38>3 edits
@kellyjay saidThe age of the universe has been measured using a variety of independent technological systems, including radioactive dating, Doppler shifts in starlight, and isotropic 3 above zero radiation background. The methods of these studies are totally unrelated. Therefore, an error that might have occurred in one would not appear in the others. Yet the data taken from these diverse studies present a strong and scientifically consistent argument for a very old Earth and an even older universe.
I completely understand, not agreeing with you doesn't mean lack of understanding. I pointed out to you I accept I can be wrong about age, it isn't a big deal for me one way or another. The fact that I believe God is putting things together takes away the need for long periods of time, I'm not concern with things coming together in deep time. I see no need for long periods o ...[text shortened]... be as it is changes, to there had to be a direct first cause, everything here is here for a reason.
This quote is from Gerald Schroeder's Genesis and the Big Bang. I recommend it if interested.
In my view, The odds of all three being wrong yet pointing to the same ages is about as likely as a cell coming to life on its own.