Compare

Compare

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
251102
22 May 11

.. the Early Church with modern Christianity.

Act 4:32 -35 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

Illinois

Joined
20 Mar 07
Moves
6804
22 May 11

Originally posted by Rajk999
.. the Early Church with modern Christianity.

Act 4:32 -35 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace ...[text shortened]... at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
What they had which we lack: the apostles. You are, after all, quoting from the book of Acts (as in, the acts of the apostles).

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
251102
22 May 11

Originally posted by epiphinehas
What they had which we lack: the apostles. You are, after all, quoting from the book of Acts (as in, the acts of the apostles).
Our religious leaders are not up to scratch then ?

Illinois

Joined
20 Mar 07
Moves
6804
22 May 11

Originally posted by Rajk999
Our religious leaders are not up to scratch then ?
I'm not sure anyone since Jesus has been given the level authority the apostles were given.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
22 May 11

Originally posted by Rajk999
.. the Early Church with modern Christianity.

Act 4:32 -35 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace ...[text shortened]... at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
You see? Jesus was a socialist. This passage, and Acts 2:43 - 47, are the reason the Hutterites live communally, with no private property.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
251102
22 May 11

Originally posted by rwingett
You see? Jesus was a socialist. This passage, and Acts 2:43 - 47, are the reason the Hutterites live communally, with no private property.
Christ was definitely in not in favour of the rich so I guess he wont have liked capitalism ..

Matt 19:23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Luke 6:24 But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
22 May 11

Originally posted by Rajk999
Christ was definitely in not in favour of the rich so I guess he wont have liked capitalism ..

Matt 19:23 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Luke 6:24 But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation.
The bible is filled with passages against the rich. It's one of the most frequently recurring topics. It's amazing, though, how so many Christians will simply ignore that and pretend that capitalism is somehow compatible with Christianity.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
22 May 11
1 edit

Originally posted by rwingett
You see? Jesus was a socialist. This passage, and Acts 2:43 - 47, are the reason the Hutterites live communally, with no private property.
regarding the Hutterites, it seems to me not to be socialism, but communism. The two may share some common characteristics but are not synonymous.

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117248
22 May 11

Originally posted by rwingett
The bible is filled with passages against the rich. It's one of the most frequently recurring topics.
No it isn't, in fact some of the wealthiest people in the bible were God's people. You live in a bigger dream world than the theists you continually decry.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
22 May 11

Originally posted by rwingett
The bible is filled with passages against the rich. It's one of the most frequently recurring topics. It's amazing, though, how so many Christians will simply ignore that and pretend that capitalism is somehow compatible with Christianity.
Even Christ learned a trade with which to support his family, as did Paul, who gave up his privileges and practised tent making.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
23 May 11

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
regarding the Hutterites, it seems to me not to be socialism, but communism. The two may share some common characteristics but are not synonymous.
I have no interest in your perception of the subtle distinctions between "socialism" and "communism".

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
23 May 11

Originally posted by divegeester
No it isn't, in fact some of the wealthiest people in the bible were God's people. You live in a bigger dream world than the theists you continually decry.
You are truly blind, Divegeester. Any fool can see the great number of passages condemning the rich.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
23 May 11

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Even Christ learned a trade with which to support his family, as did Paul, who gave up his privileges and practised tent making.
Learning a trade is not a restricted to capitalism. There will surely be carpenters and tent makers in the Kingdom.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
23 May 11

Originally posted by rwingett
You are truly blind, Divegeester. Any fool can see the great number of passages condemning the rich.
Another example of the blind leading the blind.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
23 May 11
1 edit

Originally posted by rwingett
I have no interest in your perception of the subtle distinctions between "socialism" and "communism".
Glasgow has a proud socialist tradition, but we are not communists, and the distinctions are not subtle nor a perception, its a fact. You have claimed through your text that socialism and communism are one and the same, not so.