Originally posted by Zahlanzi
awesome work.


what are you trying to prove again?


1. is true (not gonna try and prove that hitler was not a christian. it would be unnecessary to prove your "logic" is illogical)
2. if this is true, why do you need 1 ?
3. incorrect. fascists are a subgroup of christians. just because a subgroup believes in a pink fluffy unicorn doesn't make the ...[text shortened]... t's not say stupid)
5. incorrect. (read the above)

this was fun. and easy. got any more?

It was a farce, smart person.

Originally posted by scherzo
It was a farce, smart person.

And an effective farce, I would add.

Not only that, I understand the underlying precept and would consider it dishonest to attempt to refute it.

Originally posted by Badwater
And an effective farce, I would add.

Not only that, I understand the underlying precept and would consider it dishonest to attempt to refute it.

Underlying precept to what? The Islamofascism myth?

Originally posted by scherzo
Yeah ... and a funny mustache provoked World War II.

Are you sure?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Are you sure?

Well ... a short guy with half the normal genitalia and a funny mustache.

Originally posted by scherzo
It was a farce, smart person.

in web forums you have no way of telling if the person is actually stupid or is playing stupid. that is why i took your words, proven them stupid and that was that. the fact that you realized they were stupid already and just posted here to trigger a response is of no relevance to me

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
in web forums you have no way of telling if the person is actually stupid or is playing stupid. that is why i took your words, proven them stupid and that was that. the fact that you realized they were stupid already and just posted here to trigger a response is of no relevance to me

If you actually read through part of the thread, you would have noticed that, rather than just reading the thread title and impulsively reacting.

Originally posted by scherzo
If you actually read through part of the thread, you would have noticed that, rather than just reading the thread title and impulsively reacting.

i reacted to the first post, do you mean to say your first post was rubbish and i should have read the rest of the thread to see you admit it is rubbish?

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
i reacted to the first post, do you mean to say your first post was rubbish and i should have read the rest of the thread to see you admit it is rubbish?

I believe I made it pretty clear at the end of the first post that it was an intentional farce designed to refute the myth of "Islamofascism" by hitting the same nerve to Christians what "Islamofascist" hits to us Muslims. If you'd like I can spell out my logic even further for you, since there seems to be a logical jump that most people made that you didn't.