Cherry Picking

Suzianne is okay with abortion.
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.
Eladar could care less about homeless people because it doesn't fit his political view.
Rajk preaches Jesus, but is himself a vulgar non example.

In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.

All above are guilty as charged.

Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.

@chaney3 said
In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.

So?

Don't you too?

@fmf said
So?

Don't you too?

Christianity is a joke when cherry picking is common.

@chaney3 said
Suzianne is okay with abortion.
...
In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.

I see Suzianne's stance on abortion as being a political [and secular] stance. I have asked her many times about how the Bible might support her stance ~ or at least not forbid it ~ but she's declined to explain. Is it an example of "cherry-picking"? As in, it involves a selective ignoring of the 'Do Not Kill' commandment? Maybe. But there's a debate about the start of life and viability etc. I see Suzianne's stance on abortion as being more regardless-of-the-Bible, rather than an example of "cherry-picking" the Bible.

@chaney3 said
Christianity is a joke when cherry picking is common.

You mean the Christianity that you profess?

@chaney3 said
Christianity is a joke when cherry picking is common.

If you think the faith of Suzianne, divegeester, Eladar, Rajk999 and your own is all a "joke", what does it matter? What is it you want to discuss?

@chaney3 said
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.

But you’re a Christian?
You’ve always been a Christian right (sic)?
You don’t believe in Hell?

You’re a cherry picking Christian. And a jerk by the way.

@chaney3 said
Suzianne is okay with abortion.
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.
Eladar could care less about homeless people because it doesn't fit his political view.
Rajk preaches Jesus, but is himself a vulgar non example.

In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.

All above are guilty as charged.

Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.

An idiot with a computer and internet access is becoming the most annoying thing on the planet.

@rajk999 said
An idiot with a computer and internet access is becoming the most annoying thing on the planet.

This is a valuable thread.
You'll see.

@divegeester said
But you’re a Christian?
You’ve always been a Christian right (sic)?
You don’t believe in Hell?

You’re a cherry picking Christian. And a jerk by the way.

It has become my goal to confront your weakness dive, and point out your hypocrisy.

You claim to be a Christian, but refuse to change.

Are you fooling Jesus??

@chaney3 said
Suzianne is okay with abortion.
Dive is okay with being a jerk and saying hell doesn't exist.
Eladar could care less about homeless people because it doesn't fit his political view.
Rajk preaches Jesus, but is himself a vulgar non example.

In this forum, we see so-called Christians who cherry pick the bible.

All above are guilty as charged.

Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.

homosexuality is a biological failure of hormones and or neurology development in the womb.

like the children born with an open heart or without developed
intestines.

they are not "okay". they are abnormal.

this does not mean they do not deserve social fairness but it does mean that they are "abnormal" and not normal.

the error of modern times is to treat "abnormality" as a political event.

be kind to all but do not allow politics to obstruct truth.

@chaney3 said
Edit: let's not forget gays, they are fine now too.

Phew. That's a relief.

Peace be with you.

@caesar-salad said
Phew. That's a relief.

Peace be with you.

Don't waste my time fool.
Post something useful.

@chaney3 said
Don't waste my time fool.
Post something useful.

Thank you for the opportunity to practice.

🙂

@mister-moggy said
homosexuality is a biological failure of hormones and or neurology development in the womb.

like the children born with an open heart or without developed
intestines.

they are not "okay". they are abnormal.

this does not mean they do not deserve social fairness but it does mean that they are "abnormal" and not normal.

the error of modern times is to treat "abnormality" as a political event.

be kind to all but do not allow politics to obstruct truth.

Wow.
Homos are abnormal???