20 Dec '09 06:41>2 edits
“Rabbi Shm’on went out to the villages. He encountered Rabbi Abba, Rabbi Hiyya, and Rabbi Yose. Upon seeing them, he declared, ‘Innovations of Torah are required here!’” (The Zohar, 1:155b; in Daniel Matt, The Zohar, Pritzker Edition, volume II, p. 368.)
==========================================
The following is “midrashic” speculation on the midrash about “black fire on white fire”, and relating it to reading the Torah…
“Wrapped in a Holy Flame”*
“And God’s writing was on the Tables,
black fire on white fire.”
—A midrash (Tanhuma, Genesis 1)
"Thus we have learnt that the Torah was written with black fire on white fire."
—The Zohar,III:154b
____________________________________________
The letters in black fire, the surrounding space: white fire. The black fire is yesh: is-ness, existence. The white fire is ayin: nothing, not, naught, nothingness.
Everything is an oscillation between ayin and yesh. “This movement is called Ratzo v’ Shov, ‘run and return’; it teaches that there is an inherent dynamism in the world of God.” (Shimon Shokek, Kabbalah and the Art of Being: The Smithsonian Lectures.) “God is not static being, but dynamic becoming.” (Daniel Matt, The Essential Kabbalah.)
This oscillation is the “fire” that runs (ratzo) through the sephirot from keter/ayin to malchut, and the four worlds (olamim): emanating, creating, forming and actualizing—and the return (shov). Expanding and contracting; the oscillation is a pressure, a reverberation. From the perspective of emanation, moving down and up the ladder; from the perspective of return (teshuvah), moving up and down the ladder (Genesis 28:12).
And always, yesh is wrapped in the holy flame of ayin; and the flame of ayin kindles the fire of yesh. In reality, there are not two; they are mutual flames of the same fire, shimmering together. Ein Sof is the implicate ground of being, but there is no “leftover”—
“The central point is that you should never make a division within God… If you say to yourself, ‘The Ein Sof expands to a certain point, and from there on is outside of It’, God forbid, you are making a division [you have dualized].” (Moshe Cordovero, Pardes Rimonim, quoted in Jay Michaelson, Everything is God: The Radical Path of Nondual Judaism; “you have dualized”: from Daniel Matt’s translation in The Essential Kabbalah.)
Likewise if you say that in Ein Sof there are leftovers, some “part” that is not involved in the oscillation of ratzo v’shov. Just as one cannot separate the gulfstream from the ocean, one cannot separate even malchut ha’assiyah from Ein Sof, even the smallest aspect of it from Ein Sof; or Ein Sof from the smallest “particle” of the world of actualization. One cannot say that there is a “part” of Ein Sof that is uninvolved in the oscillation, just as one cannot say that there is some “part” of the ocean that is uninvolved in its streams and flows and tides. One cannot say that here are the sefirot over here, and there is Ein Sof over there: “It is they, and they are it.” Or: “The God with form is just as true as the God without form.” (Ramakrishna)
“Ben Azzai glimpsed and died”: lost in the expanse of Ein Sof (or perhaps keter), he could not return (shov).
“Ben Zoma glimpsed and went mad”: he could not hold his mind in the fiery oscillation.
“Aher (Elish ben Abuyah) tore up the shoots”: he dualized.
Likewise if you say that the (written) Torah is just the letters, and the rest is meaningless space. The white fire of Torah is fertile and informing ground; it is where the fire of Oral Torah flares up. It is the ground both of contemplation and interpretation. It is where the torah-fire of your mind meets the fire of (received) Torah. Real Torah comes out of the white fire as well as the black fire that has been written. Reading Torah is also an oscillation from yesh to ayin, from ayin to yesh. Through the four worlds of Pardes.
“No other Moses will come and bring another Torah, for there is no Torah left in heaven.” (Debarim Rabbah, 8:6)
“Heaven and earth have measures, but the Torah has none.” (Beresheet Rabbah, 10:1)
“The words of Torah are fruitful and multiply!” (BT, Tractate Hagigah, 3b)
“He who toils in Torah and discovers new meanings in it that are true contributes new Torah which is treasured by the congregation of Israel.” (Zohar, I:243a)
“A place has been left for me to labor in it [the Torah].” (BT, Tractate Hullin, 7)
[The above quotations from Louis I. Newman and Samuel Spitz, The Talmudic Anthology: Tales and Teachings of the Rabbis.]
“Wrapped on a holy flame.” Flame wrapped in flame, fire in fire, ayin/yesh in yesh/ayin. Form in emptiness, and emptiness in form. Nothing holy, everything holy.
Kadosh, kadosh, kadosh! YHVH tzevaot,
melo kol ah’aretz kevodo.
“the fullness (melo, a noun: not “is filled” but “fullness” ) of all the earth (kol ha’aretz) is your [palpable or radiant] presence (kavod).
========================================
* From the book Wrapped in a Holy Flame: Teachings and Tales of the Hasidic Masters by Zalman Shachter-Shalomi.
==========================================
The following is “midrashic” speculation on the midrash about “black fire on white fire”, and relating it to reading the Torah…
“Wrapped in a Holy Flame”*
“And God’s writing was on the Tables,
black fire on white fire.”
—A midrash (Tanhuma, Genesis 1)
"Thus we have learnt that the Torah was written with black fire on white fire."
—The Zohar,III:154b
____________________________________________
The letters in black fire, the surrounding space: white fire. The black fire is yesh: is-ness, existence. The white fire is ayin: nothing, not, naught, nothingness.
Everything is an oscillation between ayin and yesh. “This movement is called Ratzo v’ Shov, ‘run and return’; it teaches that there is an inherent dynamism in the world of God.” (Shimon Shokek, Kabbalah and the Art of Being: The Smithsonian Lectures.) “God is not static being, but dynamic becoming.” (Daniel Matt, The Essential Kabbalah.)
This oscillation is the “fire” that runs (ratzo) through the sephirot from keter/ayin to malchut, and the four worlds (olamim): emanating, creating, forming and actualizing—and the return (shov). Expanding and contracting; the oscillation is a pressure, a reverberation. From the perspective of emanation, moving down and up the ladder; from the perspective of return (teshuvah), moving up and down the ladder (Genesis 28:12).
And always, yesh is wrapped in the holy flame of ayin; and the flame of ayin kindles the fire of yesh. In reality, there are not two; they are mutual flames of the same fire, shimmering together. Ein Sof is the implicate ground of being, but there is no “leftover”—
“The central point is that you should never make a division within God… If you say to yourself, ‘The Ein Sof expands to a certain point, and from there on is outside of It’, God forbid, you are making a division [you have dualized].” (Moshe Cordovero, Pardes Rimonim, quoted in Jay Michaelson, Everything is God: The Radical Path of Nondual Judaism; “you have dualized”: from Daniel Matt’s translation in The Essential Kabbalah.)
Likewise if you say that in Ein Sof there are leftovers, some “part” that is not involved in the oscillation of ratzo v’shov. Just as one cannot separate the gulfstream from the ocean, one cannot separate even malchut ha’assiyah from Ein Sof, even the smallest aspect of it from Ein Sof; or Ein Sof from the smallest “particle” of the world of actualization. One cannot say that there is a “part” of Ein Sof that is uninvolved in the oscillation, just as one cannot say that there is some “part” of the ocean that is uninvolved in its streams and flows and tides. One cannot say that here are the sefirot over here, and there is Ein Sof over there: “It is they, and they are it.” Or: “The God with form is just as true as the God without form.” (Ramakrishna)
“Ben Azzai glimpsed and died”: lost in the expanse of Ein Sof (or perhaps keter), he could not return (shov).
“Ben Zoma glimpsed and went mad”: he could not hold his mind in the fiery oscillation.
“Aher (Elish ben Abuyah) tore up the shoots”: he dualized.
Likewise if you say that the (written) Torah is just the letters, and the rest is meaningless space. The white fire of Torah is fertile and informing ground; it is where the fire of Oral Torah flares up. It is the ground both of contemplation and interpretation. It is where the torah-fire of your mind meets the fire of (received) Torah. Real Torah comes out of the white fire as well as the black fire that has been written. Reading Torah is also an oscillation from yesh to ayin, from ayin to yesh. Through the four worlds of Pardes.
“No other Moses will come and bring another Torah, for there is no Torah left in heaven.” (Debarim Rabbah, 8:6)
“Heaven and earth have measures, but the Torah has none.” (Beresheet Rabbah, 10:1)
“The words of Torah are fruitful and multiply!” (BT, Tractate Hagigah, 3b)
“He who toils in Torah and discovers new meanings in it that are true contributes new Torah which is treasured by the congregation of Israel.” (Zohar, I:243a)
“A place has been left for me to labor in it [the Torah].” (BT, Tractate Hullin, 7)
[The above quotations from Louis I. Newman and Samuel Spitz, The Talmudic Anthology: Tales and Teachings of the Rabbis.]
“Wrapped on a holy flame.” Flame wrapped in flame, fire in fire, ayin/yesh in yesh/ayin. Form in emptiness, and emptiness in form. Nothing holy, everything holy.
Kadosh, kadosh, kadosh! YHVH tzevaot,
melo kol ah’aretz kevodo.
“the fullness (melo, a noun: not “is filled” but “fullness” ) of all the earth (kol ha’aretz) is your [palpable or radiant] presence (kavod).
========================================
* From the book Wrapped in a Holy Flame: Teachings and Tales of the Hasidic Masters by Zalman Shachter-Shalomi.