11 Nov 11
1 edit
Originally posted by wolfgang59If there were no God then there would be no such thing as atheism.
Consider if you can a universe very similar to our own ... the only difference being that God does [b]not exist. (and all atheist theories are fact)
What would be the test to distinguish our universe from the Godless one?[/b]
Atheism derives its existance from God.
11 Nov 11
Originally posted by wolfgang59Do you mean an interventionist God?
Consider if you can a universe very similar to our own ... the only difference being that God does [b]not exist. (and all atheist theories are fact)
What would be the test to distinguish our universe from the Godless one?[/b]
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
12 Nov 11
Originally posted by VoidSpiritAlso the label (concept) exists independent of the existence of god, and if we were to describe the non-believers in this 'other universe' then we use the terms from this universe.
not necessarily true. theists can exist in a godless universe while atheists can exist in a magical universe.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
12 Nov 11
Originally posted by wolfgang59I have trouble with this because we are in the universe you describe...
Consider if you can a universe very similar to our own ... the only difference being that God does [b]not exist. (and all atheist theories are fact)
What would be the test to distinguish our universe from the Godless one?[/b]
perhaps you would have more luck comparing us to a universe that does have god...
12 Nov 11
Originally posted by wolfgang59The Godless universe doesn't exist.
Consider if you can a universe very similar to our own ... the only difference being that God does [b]not exist. (and all atheist theories are fact)
What would be the test to distinguish our universe from the Godless one?[/b]
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
12 Nov 11
Originally posted by josephwThat is irrelevant.
The Godless universe doesn't exist.
The point of a thought experiment is to do a 'what if' scenario that enables conclusions to be drawn about reality.
It is a common thing to do in science to imagine what the world were different (in a specified way) and use that
as a comparison with how the world is.
It's also useful in criminal investigation (unsurprising as done properly this utilises the scientific method) for trying
to determine what kind of evidence should exist if a particular version of events (your own hypothesis or a witness
or suspects version of events) was true and whether that matches reality.
eg. Sure her blouse had blood on it but it was all smeary like she held the dead man in her arms but has no splatter
you would expect if she had been the one frenziedly attacking him....
In this instance the idea of the thought experiment is to try to get people to think about what kinds of things would
be evidently different between our universe (which supposedly, possible has a god) and one which we defined to
not have a god but that is otherwise as similar as possible without having a god.
If there is no tangible difference then that would tend to suggest the non-existence of god in this reality.
14 Nov 11
Originally posted by googlefudgewell you gave it to the theists on a plate.
That is irrelevant.
The point of a thought experiment is to do a 'what if' scenario that enables conclusions to be drawn about reality.
It is a common thing to do in science to imagine what the world were different (in a specified way) and use that
as a comparison with how the world is.
It's also useful in criminal investigation (unsurprising as ...[text shortened]... tangible difference then that would tend to suggest the non-existence of god in this reality.
I wanted them to think for themselves!
😞