Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I don't agree or disagree: I disregard it.

You have a right to reject the thread's construct but why, then, even bother to post to it?

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
The article points to the following link that reads in part:
[quote]Patrick Greene says he has always been “treated like dirt” by Christians because of his atheistic beliefs.

That recently changed, leaving Greene “completely flabbergasted.”

It happened when some Henderson County Christians offered Greene financial assistance with a medical problem des ...[text shortened]... n't "[treat him and his wife] like dirt". No wonder he was "completely flabbergasted".[/b]

Evidently it took more than 33 years for Greene to come across Christians that didn't "[treat him and his wife] like dirt". No wonder he was "completely flabbergasted".
Maybe he stopped looking for a fight long enough to see the forest for the trees.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
You have a right to reject the thread's construct but why, then, even bother to post to it?

What's your theory on that?

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
You have a right to reject the thread's construct but why, then, even bother to post to it?

You try to keep a pretty tight rein on the threads you start, Grumpy. Doesn't work.

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
What's your theory on that?

Probably the same reasons you seldom father any threads of your own... a marked preference

for sitting on your gloved hands because of a spectator pre-disposition, indecision, cowardice.


gb

Originally posted by JS357
You try to keep a pretty tight rein on the threads you start, Grumpy. Doesn't work.

Thanks for the advice.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]Agree/Disagree?


"Truth by definition excludes." -Ravi Zacharias[/b]

Excludes what?

If it's a quote lets have it's context.
If you're using it for a different purpose or meaning then lets have yours.


If you mean that having the right (true) answer to a question naturally excludes all wrong
(false) answer's then that is obviously tautologically true but so what?
What is there to debate if that's your meaning?
You might as well say that 'circles are round' agree/disagree...


Try making a post with a double digit number of words in it, or even, heaven forbid, a post
with a double digit number of sentences.

Originally posted by googlefudge

Excludes what?

If it's a quote lets have it's context.
If you're using it for a different purpose or meaning then lets have yours.


If you mean that having the right (true) answer to a question naturally excludes all wrong
(false) answer's then that is obviously tautologically true but so what?
What is there to debate if that's your mean ...[text shortened]... ber of words in it, or even, heaven forbid, a post
with a double digit number of sentences.

All that is false regarding the topic.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
All that is false regarding the topic.

Head. desk. impact.

Great well that's one possible meaning gone, do you expect me to run through all possible
meanings till I hit the one you intended? Or can you remove your head from your posterior
and actually put your OP in context so that we might have some clue as to what your getting at?

Originally posted by googlefudge
Head. desk. impact.

Great well that's one possible meaning gone, do you expect me to run through all possible
meanings till I hit the one you intended? Or can you remove your head from your posterior
and actually put your OP in context so that we might have some clue as to what your getting at?

Please relax. Regain your good manners, powers of concentration and self esteem. Quote simply

highlights the exclusivity of truth regarding any person, place, idea or thing (spiritual or secular).


Bobby

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Please relax. Regain your good manners, powers of concentration and self esteem. Quote simply

highlights the exclusivity of truth regarding any person, place, idea or thing (spiritual or secular).


Bobby

Would this be what you are on about?

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com/2007/01/its-all-relative.html

relativism vs absolutism?

Originally posted by googlefudge

Would this be what you are on about?

http://www.wordaroundthenet.com/2007/01/its-all-relative.html

relativism vs absolutism?

Unable to relate to your attempts to complicate my simple answer.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]Agree/Disagree?


"Truth by definition excludes." -Ravi Zacharias[/b]

Bad news for you if Muslims have the truth

Originally posted by Agerg
Bad news for you if Muslims have the truth

Since the quote makes no reference to any particular doctrinal belief, on what do you base your assertion?

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Since the quote makes no reference to any particular doctrinal belief, on what do you base your assertion?

Context, inference