Time-out settings

Time-out settings

Site Ideas

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

C

Joined
08 Jun 06
Moves
75461
31 Oct 09

I think when your opponent has only a king and claims a time-out, it should be a draw

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115839
31 Oct 09

Originally posted by Chandradi
I think when your opponent has only a king and claims a time-out, it should be a draw
maybe so, but there has to be some incentive to move games along, mainly for tournaments and clans and leagues . . . It's irritating to watch hopeless games lag a tournament and clan matches.

C

Joined
08 Jun 06
Moves
75461
31 Oct 09

I agree

h

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
5939
31 Oct 09

I think you should time out less often, even when your opponent only has a King left 😕

Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1037895
31 Oct 09

If you were fool enough not to move in the alloted time then you deserve to lose on timeout

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
31 Oct 09
1 edit

Originally posted by Chandradi
I think when your opponent has only a king and claims a time-out, it should be a draw
Yes, the rest of the chess world has the rules this way. RHP Blitz server has the insufficient material rule [I played a game just last night, and the game was automatically ruled drawn by the server immediately after we got to K+N vs. K].

It's time for RHP corr server to follow suit.

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
31 Oct 09
1 edit

At the least, the most common three cases should be programmed.

King versus King
King and Knight versus King
King and Bishop versus King

All such positions should be immediately declared drawn.

Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1037895
01 Nov 09

Originally posted by SwissGambit
At the least, the most common three cases should be programmed.

King versus King
King and Knight versus King
King and Bishop versus King

All such positions should be immediately declared drawn.
I agree but this wimp had sufficient material so possible mate or stalemate so his own stupidity

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
01 Nov 09

Originally posted by Mctayto
I agree but this wimp had sufficient material so possible mate or stalemate so his own stupidity
I'm a big fan of enforcing time controls, but I don't think a player ought to be given a win by clock in a position that they could never win over-the-board, even with the most helpful/inept opponent.

C

Joined
08 Jun 06
Moves
75461
01 Nov 09

yes

Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1037895
01 Nov 09

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I'm a big fan of enforcing time controls, but I don't think a player ought to be given a win by clock in a position that they could never win over-the-board, even with the most helpful/inept opponent.
If your opponent can't be bothered to move then I totally disagree, simply because he thought he had it won he sat on his hands - deserved the skulling

S
Caninus Interruptus

2014.05.01

Joined
11 Apr 07
Moves
92274
02 Nov 09

Originally posted by Mctayto
If your opponent can't be bothered to move then I totally disagree, simply because he thought he had it won he sat on his hands - deserved the skulling
I have no issue with the skulling. By all means, allow the skull to be claimed. Just make the result a draw.

The guy with the won game still loses something - he only gets a draw, not a win.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
02 Nov 09

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I have no issue with the skulling. By all means, allow the skull to be claimed. Just make the result a draw.

The guy with the won game still loses something - he only gets a draw, not a win.
"To be skulled is to be lost" - anonymous

...and I agree. Time management is a part of the game.

C

Joined
08 Jun 06
Moves
75461
09 Nov 09

Not if a king only.

Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1037895
09 Nov 09

Originally posted by Chandradi
Not if a king only.
The forces of public opinion are against you 😉