14 Sep 05
Originally posted by SicilianNajdorfThere, u took the words right out of my mouth.
This would be a better idea . Every time you make a move , the server stores the move rating and when you complete the game , in the Game History , next to the move , it shows you the rating out of a 100 comparing all the possible moves you could play and the analysis it follows.
That is exactly what i was trying to tell. Sometimes the way you tell or ask something isnt always understandable to others.
19 Sep 05
1 edit
Originally posted by NicolaasThat makes no sense.
How do you define that my idea is stupid?
The same goes with the moves, stupid!
You haven't actually said how you expect the site to judge the best move every move. The top 5 most active players alone have played over 25000 moves this month. Even if you assume that an engine can find the best move (it can't) there is no way in hell there would be enough computing power to analyse every move.
Your idea is retarded and I'm starting to realise why.
19 Sep 05
Originally posted by kw72ukIt's plenty good. It's not quite as powerful as a chessbase engine like fritz, but it really makes no difference as to engine strength. However, the two programs are quite different, so I'd do some research if I were you.
Is Chessmaster no good? I'm looking to buy a chess computer but am unsure which one to get. CM10 has been recommended.
BTW, you don't have to read the insults. Personally, I find them quite amusing and refreshing.
22 Sep 05
Hey, guys! I mean guys that are'nt sudscribers! I have an idea to rate our made moves or our played games; the quantity of our moves and games! when, for example, not being a subscriber, played 200 or 500 playes i get an opportunity to play more than six games, for example, 20! How is it?😠😛