14 Feb 05
Originally posted by howitzerif you get a non-subscriber then just delete the game and put up another open invite
It would be useful to restrict open invites not just by rating but also by subscription status. I find subscribers are genearly keener, less likely to cheat(!), and nicer all in all. For this reason I would like to restrict my open invitations to subscribers.
14 Feb 05
1 edit
Originally posted by howitzersuddenly find their game deleted? Did you have it in the game title that you didn't want to play them? Don't worry about them, if they are dumb enough to click into a game they have no right to play considering the title.
This is what I do at the moment, but almost 30-40% of my invites are taken by non-subscibers which means a lot of unhappy folk who suddenly find their game deleted.
P
14 Feb 05
Originally posted by PhlabibitI always name the game "Pawn Stars Only" or somesuch.
suddenly find their game deleted? Did you have it in the game title that you didn't want to play them? Don't worry about them, if they are dumb enough to click into a game they have no right to play considering the title.
P
It's also just a bit annoying to constantly delete the games. It's as if you were unable to 'limit' an open invite by rating and could only name it- lots of people outside of the range would ignore the name or just try their luck.
14 Feb 05
1 edit
Originally posted by howitzerI'm a non-subscriber - yet i am quite keen 😀 (play multiple moves every single day of the week) - dont cheat (unless you count knowing the rules) and consider myself to be quite nice (in most respects anyway😉)
It would be useful to restrict open invites not just by rating but also by subscription status. I find subscribers are genearly keener, less likely to cheat(!), and nicer all in all. For this reason I would like to restrict my open invitations to subscribers.
Why delete a game with someone of equal (or at least similar) rating simply because the opponent doesnt have a star by his name??
Does it really matter THAT much??😕
Ok I understand that you have put "Pawn Stars Only" in the title and yes they are stupid for joining the game regardless, but why do you discriminate at all??
(",)
16 Feb 05
Originally posted by howitzerOn the flip side i find non-subscribers generally have inflated ratings. I'll happily play a 1700 non pawn star as i'll bet money their only 1500 in reality. 😀
It would be useful to restrict open invites not just by rating but also by subscription status. I find subscribers are genearly keener, less likely to cheat(!), and nicer all in all. For this reason I would like to restrict my open invitations to subscribers.
16 Feb 05
On the flip side i find non-subscribers generally have inflated ratings. I'll happily play a 1700 non pawn star as i'll bet money their only 1500 in reality. 😀Another good one. Open Invites are regularly taken by provisional players (who I don't want to mess about!) who have provisional ratings - not the most accurate!