08 Feb 07
Originally posted by FabianFnasLOL! If you want to cop out, please do. Just don't pretend it's me who's not understanding.
Which part of my statements didn't you understand?
You wrote:
I won't go further into this line than this: When I see people having problems, they are adviced to use methods that has nothing to do with IE. Therefore I conclude the problem must be FF oriented.
Do you retract this statement? If not, my comments stand since your conclusion (marked in bold, for your convenience) is bullcrap.
It does not follow from the fact that Firefox presents solutions to problems that the problem is 'FF oriented'.
Clear enough for you? God, I hope I don't have to dumb it down even further so you understand.
Originally posted by PalynkaYou have not yet understood what I've written.
LOL! If you want to cop out, please do. Just don't pretend it's me who's not understanding.
You wrote:
I won't go further into this line than this: When I see people having problems, they are adviced to use methods that has nothing to do with IE. [b]Therefore I conclude the problem must be FF oriented.
Do you retract this statement? If not, ...[text shortened]... enough for you? God, I hope I don't have to dumb it down even further so you understand.[/b]
If you read my earlier threads you'll see that I've had the same opinion from the beginning.
This is the last posting I give in this thread.
Originally posted by FabianFnasIt's right there in black and white.
You have not yet understood what I've written.
If you read my earlier threads you'll see that I've had the same opinion from the beginning.
This is the last posting I give in this thread.
Wriggling yourself away pretending it's me who doesn't understand is really shallow from your part. But it's not surprising considering your high-horse stand on this thread.
Originally posted by FabianFnasThread 62459
A lot of problems here stem from FireFox, almost never from Internet Explorer.
D