Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43791164
There you go again. All that article says is there is a "link" to Hannity from Cohen. It doesn't say he is a client. The title of the article says he is a client, but nothing within the article says that.
It seems like people are doing a lot of assuming without any real proof.
You said Cohen and Hannity admitted Hannity is a client of Cohen's. That clearly is not true. Cohen took the fifth so I know he has not admitted it. It gave Trump critics the chance to point out Trump's hypocrisy for implying Hitlery Clinton was guilty for pleading the fifth. Trump is another guy that doesn't think before he speaks, or tweets.
Every article you posted for me says Hannity denies it. I think you got ahead of yourself by pulling a humy. You should resist the urge to "assume".
Now back to Skripal. This is my best guess as to what you might be thinking. Russia poisoned Skripal with a Russian nerve poison to make it apparent that Russia will poison traitors even though they will never admit it publicly.
If Russia wants certain people to know Russia punishes traitors with Novachok why the damage control by accusing the west of doing it? Is the RT article for convincing Russian citizens their government didn't do that? After all, Putin or whoever is behind it wanted to make it clear that Russia poisons traitors to at least some Russians or they would not have used a Russian nerve poison. Did too many Russians get the message because Putin was overly overt with the Novachok? Is that roughly about what you are thinking?