27 Apr 14
Originally posted by RJHindsYes, it is such an obviously easy problem it should have been figured out 100 years ago. Is THAT how your brain works?
Well, let me know when you think someone has it figured out.
In fact, it is one of the most complex and mysterious processes as a problem in all of science, how life started.
That does not detract from the FACT that life origin science is distinct from evolution science.
You denigrate all the work that will in the future, whether 20 years from now or 200 years from now that will lead to a complete understanding of how life started here on Earth, a very difficult problem and because of that difficulty you think you have the right to denigrate entire sciences.
You should really butt out of science and let science answer the big questions in its own time, which might be 50 years down the road or 500 years, it doesn't really matter, as long as we can keep science going.
You would rather see civilization fail and everyone go back to the stone age rather than actually figuring out how we got here if that proof entails chemistry, energy, and water combining to make life on Earth from dead molecules.
That you would not permit if you were the czar of science. Fortunately science is going on quite well without the input of you and your creationist assshole buddies.
27 Apr 14
Originally posted by sonhouseThere can be no evolution without the origin of life. Now can there?
Yes, it is such an obviously easy problem it should have been figured out 100 years ago. Is THAT how your brain works?
In fact, it is one of the most complex and mysterious processes as a problem in all of science, how life started.
That does not detract from the FACT that life origin science is distinct from evolution science.
You denigrate all ...[text shortened]... y science is going on quite well without the input of you and your creationist assshole buddies.
I suggest you guys work more on the origin of life and get that figured out first, then I bet the rest of it will start falling into place much more easily.
27 Apr 14
Originally posted by RJHindsDon't you worry your little biased head about it, both origins and evolution are being actively worked on as we speak.
There can be no evolution without the origin of life. Now can there?
I suggest you guys work more on the origin of life and get that figured out first, then I bet the rest of it will start falling into place much more easily.
They are still separate disciplines because evolution only deals with life already extant.
Your pathetic attempts at argument holds no credit and never has. Only in your mind. The real world will figure it out and we can stop trying to argue with asssholes like you who can't see the forest for the trees.
27 Apr 14
Originally posted by sonhouseIf they ever figure it out, they will find that young earth creationists were right all the time.
Don't you worry your little biased head about it, both origins and evolution are being actively worked on as we speak.
They are still separate disciplines because evolution only deals with life already extant.
Your pathetic attempts at argument holds no credit and never has. Only in your mind. The real world will figure it out and we can stop trying to argue with asssholes like you who can't see the forest for the trees.
27 Apr 14
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYou only have a limited amount of time to promulgate such statements.
If they ever figure it out, they will find that young earth creationists were right all the time.
Have fun with it while you can, you and your buddies are definitely running out of time.
BTW, did you actually read the piece I posted or did you just dismiss it out of hand? I suspect the latter.
27 Apr 14
Originally posted by sonhouseI read it. However, I do not believe you can look 200 years into the future.
You only have a limited amount of time to promulgate such statements.
Have fun with it while you can, you and your buddies are definitely running out of time.
BTW, did you actually read the piece I posted or did you just dismiss it out of hand? I suspect the latter.
27 Apr 14
Originally posted by RJHindsThis article I just posted proves there is work being done on this front all the time. It is therefore just a matter of time before the whole mystery is unraveled. I don't think you would want to be around on that day because it would mean we will be able to take dead rocks and make them into a life form. Too bad for ancient Egyptian mythology you worship.
I read it. However, I do not believe you can look 200 years into the future.
27 Apr 14
Originally posted by sonhouseThen the ancient Egyptians would be right about making gods out of stone. But that will be only in your dreams.
This article I just posted proves there is work being done on this front all the time. It is therefore just a matter of time before the whole mystery is unraveled. I don't think you would want to be around on that day because it would mean we will be able to take dead rocks and make them into a life form. Too bad for ancient Egyptian mythology you worship.
28 Apr 14
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsOh yes you do, Jews did not originate the 6 day creation myth, Egyptians did a couple thousand years before Jews plagiarized it and that is EXACTLY what you worship.
You are wrong again. I do not worship ancient Egyptian mythology.
That is a fact. I saw the cartouche with my own two eyes at the Cairo museum, you should go there sometime, it is an eye opener.
Right down to on the 7th day he rested. Right. Like a god would need to rest. Give me a break.
28 Apr 14
Originally posted by sonhouseIf so, they must have got it from Joseph or Moses.
Oh yes you do, Jews did not originate the 6 day creation myth, Egyptians did a couple thousand years before Jews plagiarized it and that is EXACTLY what you worship.
That is a fact. I saw the cartouche with my own two eyes at the Cairo museum, you should go there sometime, it is an eye opener.
Right down to on the 7th day he rested. Right. Like a god would need to rest. Give me a break.