Originally posted by Palynka
Do you speak English?

Mai. Khun pasa Thai mai na?

Pom kid khun ting tong, baa, mao!

ae hea, ae sut! 😏

Originally posted by mikelom
Mai. Khun pasa Thai mai na?

Pom kid khun ting tong, baa, mao!

ae hea, ae sut! 😏

Am I supposed to be impressed at your rudimentary knowledge of the language of the country you live in?

Originally posted by Palynka
Am I supposed to be impressed at your rudimentary knowledge of the language of the country you live in?

Rudimentary?

You, above all people, know that this site does not accept the Thai alphabet as usage. To know both Thai alphabet, and how to use it with the English alphabet is far from rudimentary. Indeed, it is at the forefront of communication with the West.

What's your problem?

If you want me to make a full posed post in Thai, please ask - it shall be written in full, accurately, so that you may use what ever translator you can find to attempt to translate it.... the only way you will be able to do that is to use a Thai person and not a computer.

In fact, prove to me you can:

[WORD TOO LONG] ผมคิดว่าคุณไม่ดี ไม่ต้องมารบกวน [WORD TOO LONG] ที่แปลเป็นภาษาไทย [WORD TOO LONG] โตซะที

-m.

Originally posted by mikelom
Rudimentary?

You, above all people, know that this site does not accept the Thai alphabet as usage. To know both Thai alphabet, and how to use it with the English alphabet is far from rudimentary. Indeed, it is at the forefront of communication with the West.

What's your problem?

If you want me to make a full posed post in Thai, please ask - it shal ...[text shortened]... 35;ไม่ได้ โตซะที

-m.

Like I said, am I supposed to be impressed at your rudimentary knowledge of the language of the country you live in?

Besides, no matter what language you use to say it, it will be nonsense. That was the point of my original question about English, which evidently you didn't get.

Originally posted by Palynka
Like I said, am I supposed to be impressed at your rudimentary knowledge of the language of the country you live in?

Besides, no matter what language you use to say it, it will be nonsense. That was the point of my original question about English, which evidently you didn't get.

I didn't pre-suppose anything.

Did I ask you to be impressed? Your own agenda is however you conceive of it. If you are impressed, so be it. If you are not impressed, so be it. I never asked. Stop trying to be a smart alec. It doesn't wash with me anymore! 😛

As for rudimentary, how do you judge so, when you KNOW NOTHING about it?

As for your quite pathetic comment of whatever language is used to speak Thai it will be nonsense - what planet were you on when you posted that passe remark?

-m.

Edit: Oh! And I'm not stupid enough not to realise you were implying whatever I write is nonsense, I just rise above you - that's easy! 😉

Originally posted by mikelom
I didn't pre-suppose anything.

Did I ask you to be impressed? Your own agenda is however you conceive of it. If you are impressed, so be it. If you are not impressed, so be it. I never asked. Stop trying to be a smart alec. It doesn't wash with me anymore! 😛

As for rudimentary, how do you judge so, when you KNOW NOTHING about it?

As for your quite ...[text shortened]... lise you were implying whatever I write is nonsense, I just rise above you - that's easy! 😉

You're trying too hard.

Originally posted by Palynka
You're trying too hard.

Thread wrecker! 😠

😉

-m.

Originally posted by mikelom
Alexander's number and Graham's number cannot count upto my number, as my number is immeasurable.

Mathematician's can't even draw up a principle, first principle, for measuring human emotion or attitude.

My number, 'L', is for love.

I suggest there is no principle number or theory for attempting to measure this reality, and therefore claim 'L' = Mik

I win. 😀😀

Mike's Number (L) IS THE BIGGEST NUMBER IN THE WORLD. 😏

-m. 😉

Love is non-existent. It is just a concept created to trick you into either searching for it your whole life or thinking you found it . Both possiblities cause you to sacrifice your well being in the pursuit of a farce.

Originally posted by tomtom232
Love is non-existent. It is just a concept created to trick you into either searching for it your whole life or thinking you found it . Both possiblities cause you to sacrifice your well being in the pursuit of a farce.

Just been dumped?

Originally posted by mikelom
the emotion of love?


-m.

Once again love is non-existent, but if it did exist it would not be classified as an emotion. Its just a big farce.

Originally posted by Palynka
Just been dumped?

No. Love tends to be defined as an intense desire or need. That sounds like an unhealthy addiction to me.

Originally posted by tomtom232
No. Love tends to be defined as an intense desire or need. That sounds like an unhealthy addiction to me.

Of course there is the reciprocal to that!

Maybe one can love oneself so much, that there is no addiction for the need for it, and the addiction, as you term it, is not necessary.

I believe that would take you into negative constants, or final figure, in the L theoretical equation. Your life insurance must cost a bomb! 😉

Originally posted by tomtom232
No. Love tends to be defined as an intense desire or need. That sounds like an unhealthy addiction to me.

What's unhealthy about it?

Originally posted by tomtom232
Once again love is non-existent, but if it did exist it would not be classified as an emotion. Its just a big farce.

LOL, just trolling I see.

Originally posted by tomtom232
No. Love tends to be defined as an intense desire or need. That sounds like an unhealthy addiction to me.

So, never even been in a position to get dumped, then.

Richard