Originally posted by Palynka Our brain drives it. The difference between talking about desire or the brain process, for a biologist/neurologist, is ultimately semantics. So I don't see where you're going.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage Isn't that 'inner inclination' a clue to the nature, or the process, of desire? (Nature is a process).
it seems to me that desire is the emanation of the inner inclination
and that the act itself is the emanation of our desire whereas our act took this path or the other or the other and so on
Don't close it that fast. Every influence of culture in our thoughts, preferences,etc. must be also reflected in our brain. Where else?
(shouting from a distance)
Does that really answer the question?
(gesturing)
- What is the nature of desire?
- It's in our brains.
- OK. Why do some prefer blondes.
- It's in their brains.
- I see.
- No, your brain sees.
- Next time I have a question I'll ask my brain.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage (shouting from a distance)
Does that really answer the question?
(gesturing)
- What is the nature of desire?
- It's in our brains.
- OK. Why do some prefer blondes.
- It's in their brains.
- I see.
- No, your brain sees.
- Next time I have a question I'll ask my brain.
But I wasn't answering The Question!
I was explaining why, in my view, your relabeling it from brain process to desire doesn't help to answer it. In your previous post, I assumed you were implying that if it is in the brain it's not cultural.
Originally posted by Palynka But I wasn't answering The Question!
I was explaining why, in my view, your relabeling it from brain process to desire doesn't help to answer it. In your previous post, I assumed you were implying that if it is in the brain it's not cultural.
I can't answer for you, obviously. I'd like to know. Sexuality is an important facet of our lives, so I think understanding it can only be a good thing.
Originally posted by Palynka I can't answer for you, obviously. I'd like to know. Sexuality is an important facet of our lives, so I think understanding it can only be a good thing.
Or maybe (I was asking you to answer for you, btw) 'what' is the question. First what, then how, then why, for the metaphysically inclined.
OK. So what is sex? I know it's in the brain -- but what is it?
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage Or maybe (I was asking you to answer for you, btw) 'what' is the question. First what, then how, then why, for the metaphysically inclined.
OK. So what is sex? I know it's in the brain -- but what is it?
Sex is in the brain? đ
Look, Bosse, I'm tired of chasing your red cape. If you don't have an interest in discussing this, then just go. The question is in the initial post.
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage I'll just watch quietly if you don't mind. All I want to know for now is what you think about -- the initial post.
I know epi is a Christian, but I don't know his position on homosexuality nor his motives for asking this.
Regardless, I think that the fact he wants to look at evidence is by itself a positive step. I don't presume to know what implications he will draw from that evidence.
If you're implying he wants to attack homosexuality, I honestly don't see how it being cultural or genetic makes any difference.