Originally posted by Thequ1ckI consider you as the departing point of the topic, because your opinions, or at least the opinions posted here, depart from a personal standpoint which is built on top of ideas and feelings developed throughout the person's life.
That's rich Seitse.
Want to stay on topic though?
Let me hear your pain, son.
Originally posted by SeitseDeparting from scientific method so early Seitse?
I consider you as the departing point of the topic, because your opinions, or at least the opinions posted here, depart from a personal standpoint which is built on top of ideas and feelings developed throughout the person's life.
Let me hear your pain, son.
I don't think you're meant to start with the conclusion.
It's OK that you believe me to be a liar. Palynka has
already talked me through this sort of motivation.
What did he call it? Oh yes, cognitive dissonance.
Originally posted by epiphinehasI believe most evidence points to homosexuality being a genetic trait, or at least a genetic predisposition.
I'd like to discuss what evidence there is in support of homosexuality as a biologically and/or environmentally (prenatal) determined anomaly.
_________
I know of two recent articles of import.
(1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jun/16/neuroscience.psychology
(2) http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/science/2008/December/Males-of-All-S ...[text shortened]... hape of the brain and the other with the effect pollution may have on the masculinity of males.