04 Feb 17
Originally posted by lemon limeTwhitead and all others on this forum subscribe to Darwins theories as fact, even though those facts are unproven and hold no merit.
You started it by insulting him, then you equate lying with errors, and now you probably don't like the fact that I've pointed out your errors.
And yet, here you are acting like the science forum is your own personal clubhouse... another error.
How do you manage to get in so many errors and false claims with so very few words?
Science, along with twhitehead will create falsehoods at extreme levels, to refute design, at all costs, to feed their ego.
They will never give design a fair chance due to ego and narcissim.
They put themselves above God. Clearly.
04 Feb 17
Originally posted by chaney3God is dead.
Twhitead and all others on this forum subscribe to Darwins theories as fact, even though those facts are unproven and hold no merit.
Science, along with twhitehead will create falsehoods at extreme levels, to refute design, at all costs, to feed their ego.
They will never give design a fair chance due to ego and narcissim.
They put themselves above God. Clearly.
Nietzsche
04 Feb 17
Originally posted by chaney3From what I can tell, you don't even know what Darwins theories are.
Twhitead and all others on this forum subscribe to Darwins theories as fact, even though those facts are unproven and hold no merit.
Science, along with twhitehead will create falsehoods at extreme levels, to refute design, at all costs, to feed their ego.
Says the blatant liar who has ignored my request for a reference to support a false claim he made ages ago and has since pretended never happened.
I bet you cannot name a single 'falsehood' that I created 'at extreme levels' (hence the very vague accusatory sentence).
They put themselves above God. Clearly.
There is no God to put myself above. Clearly.
Now go back to the bottle and pretend its not true.
04 Feb 17
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou cannot prove evolution without assigning it intelligence.
From what I can tell, you don't even know what Darwins theories are.
[b]Science, along with twhitehead will create falsehoods at extreme levels, to refute design, at all costs, to feed their ego.
Says the blatant liar who has ignored my request for a reference to support a false claim he made ages ago and has since pretended never happened.
I b ...[text shortened]... e is no God to put myself above. Clearly.
Now go back to the bottle and pretend its not true.[/b]
Evolution would not care about survival of the fittest, as Darwin suggested.
He was wrong.
04 Feb 17
Originally posted by chaney3You make 3 claims, all of them incorrect. Because:
You cannot prove evolution without assigning it intelligence.
Evolution would not care about survival of the fittest, as Darwin suggested.
He was wrong.
1. It has already been explained to you that evolution doesn't require intelligence.
2. Evolution doesn't 'care' about anything.
3. Darwin was right.
05 Feb 17
Originally posted by chaney3You cannot substantiate your blatant lies about me without having intelligence.
You cannot prove evolution without assigning it intelligence.
Evolution would not care about survival of the fittest, as Darwin suggested.
You haven't got a clue what Darwin suggested or what evolution actually is.
He was wrong
I note that you have once again ignored my request for a reference for your previous false claim.
You were wrong.
And you are wrong again.
And you don't have the honesty to admit it.