22 Aug '20 11:31>
@metal-brain saidWhat has that got to do with anything I just said in that post of mine?
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/how-does-lead-absorb-radiation-x-rays-and-gamma-rays
@metal-brain saidWhat has that got to do with anything I just said in that post of mine?
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/how-does-lead-absorb-radiation-x-rays-and-gamma-rays
@humy saidIt isn't a problem if you have enough lead. It is just a matter of finding a source in our solar system. The mining would have to be done by robots first though. Once a space craft could be fitted with enough lead plating it could be surrounded with an artificial magnetic field with something to absorb the charged particles before they reach the magnetic poles. Isn't that what happens in the earth's atmosphere before the northern lights reach the north magnetic pole?
What has that got to do with anything I just said in that post of mine?
@metal-brain saidYou mean just have the lead at the poles and not surrounding the whole part of the space capsule?
Once a space craft could be fitted with enough lead plating it could be surrounded with an artificial magnetic field with something to absorb the charged particles before they reach the magnetic poles.
@humy saidNo. That is not what I said. Go back and read what I wrote again.
You mean just have the lead at the poles and not surrounding the whole part of the space capsule?
If so, for the reason I already explained in a previous post, that would give very little protection because a magnetic field wouldn't deflect X-rays and gamma-rays from distant supernovae explosions and other distant high-energy cosmic events and thus most of that dangerous radia ...[text shortened]... netic field can only significantly deflect charged particles and not electromagnetic radiation. ..."
@sonhouse saidI am not sure of the prospects of designing a more effective and much less massive gamma ray shield than lead shielding but I assume the only hope of that being possible is if the material can somehow be designed not to rely on the atomic nuclei to absorb the gamma rays but rather rely on the configuration of molecular electron bonds and orbitals between the atomic nuclei to absorb the gamma rays but really don't know if there is any suitable possible configuration of molecular electron bonds and orbitals that could potentially be effective for that.
@humy
There are new developments on the shielding idea.
https://phys.org/news/2020-07-mxene-material-extraordinary-electromagnetic-shielding.html
The only caveat I see in this post is they don't mention frequencies so it might only be good for gigahertz radiation, but not sure since the frequency bands of protection are not written in this article.
Here is anoth ...[text shortened]... stics for radiation shielding:
https://www.professionalplastics.com/Radiation_Sheilding_Materials
@wolfgang59 saidJust for one moment I thought you were being SERIOUS!
A simple solution to the radiation problem is to re-route
power from the phasers to the shields, that normally works.
@humy saidOf course not! The deflector array couldn't handle that much power.
Just for one moment I thought you were being SERIOUS!