0.5% of climate scientists, not 97%

Originally posted by sonhouse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer

Scroll down to 1960 Phobos hypothesis

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Wikipedia???? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3072395/replies?c=14

http://www.auricmedia.net/scientist-claims-mars-moon-phobos-is-hollow-and-artificial/

Note these are not Wiki's. I told you UFO nuts love him.

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Dude, give it up. None of those sites are credible. You are embarrassing yourself!

Originally posted by sonhouse
Struck a chord, I see. Your hero has spots. Now we know for sure where your anti climate stance comes from. You are a Singerite.

Originally posted by Metal Brain
You are really desperate and still embarrassing yourself. Dr. Singer is very well respected. Do you honestly think he could have gained that status if those phobos lies were true? It defies logic! Seriously, stop embarassing yourself.

I have to admit you made me laugh really hard though....lol! 😀

Originally posted by sonhouse
Here is another site that says Singer supported Shklovskii:

http://thearrowsoftruth.com/tag/mars-anomalies/

1960 is a long time ago, I doubt if there are papers available from that year.

I don't think the information contained in so many sites would be lying. It is just you who cannot accept your dude might be out in left field.

Well, here he is in FINE company: Rush Limbaugh

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-127787073.html

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Read this article so you realize how much people lie about Dr. Singer. You could come up with a dozen wacko websites nobody has heard of and it would make no difference. You are just desperate because your world is crumbling. Suck it up and get over it!

http://www.nas.org/articles/The_Father_of_Global_Warming_Skepticism_An_Interview_with_S_Fred_Singer

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Have you sent him any love letters yet?

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Like humy I see you gave up on the facts and have regressed to stupid comments since that is all you both have. Are you going to resort to slanderous weblinks nobody has heard of like sonhouse and gfudge too? 🙄

Originally posted by sonhouse
And of course those sites just HAVE to be 100% wrong. Why don't you email your hero and find out for yourself?

Back to the subject. There is no consensus according to respected climate scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer. All attempts to slander him with lies has failed.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/climate_consensus_con_game.html

Originally posted by Metal Brain
No need to verify it is a lie, it is just common sense. Dr. Singer isn't stupid enough to sabotage his own career to please a bunch of wackos. If you had read that link I provided you would see that one lie leads to others repeating the same lie because they just accepted it like idiots. You are doing the same thing. He even mentions some of the lies on ...[text shortened]... thread? I think you were. You would not be continuing to make yourself look foolish if you had.

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Back to the subject. There is no consensus according to respected climate scientist Dr. S. Fred Singer. All attempts to slander him with lies has failed.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/02/climate_consensus_con_game.html

Originally posted by sonhouse
Common sense? Even Carl Sagan supported the phobos nonsense, thinking it was an artificial satellite. If it was artificial, it went through a war🙂 You don't accept Singer could have supported such a claim and you refuse to believe such. That is your problem not ours.
I read your article and there may even be a shred of truth in it, but there was nothing in that piece that even hinted at the Phobos hypothesis.