trotoise and achilles

trotoise and achilles

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

C

On the computer

Joined
30 Mar 06
Moves
675
15 Apr 06

http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/prime/articles/zeno_tort/
Follow the link to one of the classic paradoxes.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
15 Apr 06
1 edit

Trotoise? This is indeed a puzzle.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
15 Apr 06

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Trotoise? This is indeed a puzzle.
You didn't know about the Trotoise? Its just a hare faster than a tortoise and so modifies the original puzzle.

7 edits

The moral highground

Joined
06 May 04
Moves
34658
15 Apr 06

Its easy.

You are spliting both the time and distance into infinate parts. Thuthey cancel each other out, and it only takes him a small time to reach the tourtoise.

GP

Joined
10 Mar 06
Moves
4933
16 Apr 06
1 edit

Aristotle tackled Zeno's Paradox, I believe, along with trying to find a way to measure the area bounded by a curve, reducing the solution into smaller parts ad infinitum. It's sad that he was soooooooooo close to developing integral calculus before he was slain by a Roman soldier and the library at Alexandria was sacked and burned, destroying so much of his work. Imagine if calculus had been developed fully in 300 BC instead of the late 1600's. There's a "what if" question for you.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
17 Apr 06

Originally posted by General Putzer
Aristotle tackled Zeno's Paradox, I believe, along with trying to find a way to measure the area bounded by a curve, reducing the solution into smaller parts ad infinitum. It's sad that he was soooooooooo close to developing integral calculus before he was slain by a Roman soldier and the library at Alexandria was sacked and burned, destroying so much ...[text shortened]... eveloped fully in 300 BC instead of the late 1600's. There's a "what if" question for you.
Indeed, gunpowder would have not been far behind and the knowledge of trajectories given by the new maths. It almost happened in china too, they were delving into infintesimals also.
And there were supposedly batteries in Iraq a few thousand years ago too. BTW, while we are on the subject of ancients, did you get the news about the huge pyramids discovered in Bosnia? 220 meters high, the locals always called them Pyramid hills, not realizing they actually WERE pyramids.

i

Joined
30 Oct 04
Moves
7813
17 Apr 06

Originally posted by General Putzer
Aristotle tackled Zeno's Paradox, I believe, along with trying to find a way to measure the area bounded by a curve, reducing the solution into smaller parts ad infinitum. It's sad that he was soooooooooo close to developing integral calculus before he was slain by a Roman soldier and the library at Alexandria was sacked and burned, destroying so much ...[text shortened]... eveloped fully in 300 BC instead of the late 1600's. There's a "what if" question for you.
That would be Archimedes. Aristotle really did made attempts at explaining the paradox but not very succesful. Besides Xeno's "paradoxes" were aimed at showing the difficulties of giving rational explanation of movement. Thus he did try to decribe the four possible cases (discrete time&continous spaces, continous time&discrete space, discrete time & discrete space, continous time&continous space) and the logical inconsistencies that appear within each of them.

GP

Joined
10 Mar 06
Moves
4933
17 Apr 06

arghhhhh....yes, Archimedes, not Aristotle. Good catch.

I MEANT Archimedes

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
19 Apr 06

Boring paradox that's been posted here time and again 😴



Yo.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Apr 06

Originally posted by Bowmann
Boring paradox that's been posted here time and again 😴



Yo.
Yep, wonder when the next version will be out.