Yes Jo, I know what you mean. With some of the sub topics of maths it is very difficult to find 'real life' situations where what is being learnt can actually be used.
I remember when I was being taught the 'J' notation in pure maths. I asked the tutor what use was it, now that we can 'cheat' and take the sq root of a negative number.
The look of disgust I got was amazing and my question was never answered. I'm sure someone one day will tell me a use nut until then it seems it was an exercise just for the sake of it.
Removed
Joined
10 Dec '06
Moves
8528
17 Nov '13 06:51>
Originally posted by Ponderable Mathematics is a philosophical discipline. It works with a set of axoims and Operators and expands from there. Some physical phenomena can be described by mathematical formula.
It is pleasing to find a simple mathematical Expression to explain physical behaviour, but it is not proof that the theoretical Approach is correct.
On the other hand minimizat ...[text shortened]... athematical minimization algorithm if you find a physical example (think dense sphere packings).
I think that is a wonderful way to not answer a question, but I "feel" that the universe is truly mathematical, not physical.
Sorry Jo, that was not intentional. Did not read your question thoroughly.
Got to hold hands up and say not quite sure what you mean by the universe being mathmatical and not physical. Would you mind expanding on your thoughts please?
Removed
Joined
10 Dec '06
Moves
8528
18 Nov '13 00:11>
Originally posted by eltricky Sorry Jo, that was not intentional. Did not read your question thoroughly.
Got to hold hands up and say not quite sure what you mean by the universe being mathmatical and not physical. Would you mind expanding on your thoughts please?
I was responding to Ponderable, so it wasn't aimed at you.
As for expanding on my thoughts, I guess it just seems to me that Mathematics could very well stand on its own without the presence of Physics, but a Physics without Math would be a limited subject. Also, my opinion (as of now) is that the universe is ultimately just a simulation, so the "Physics" that we experience ( our reality ) is actually just the result of mathematics in the simulations programming.
It could even be that we are just androids. Look at what we are attempting to do with artificial intelligence ourselves. Its foreseeable that we will create an android that has enough intellect to question it own existence, when that happens, it should be like looking in the mirror for humanity, however I expect that most will not like what they see.
Originally posted by joe shmo I think that is a wonderful way to not answer a question, but I "feel" that the universe is truly mathematical, not physical.
In a nutshell my answers are:
a) neither
b) no
Removed
Joined
10 Dec '06
Moves
8528
18 Nov '13 21:35>
Originally posted by Ponderable In a nutshell my answers are:
a) neither
b) no
Yeah, I gathered that much from your first response, but thanks for summarizing.
Originally posted by joe shmo I was responding to Ponderable, so it wasn't aimed at you.
As for expanding on my thoughts, I guess it just seems to me that Mathematics could very well stand on its own without the presence of Physics, but a Physics without Math would be a limited subject. Also, my opinion (as of now) is that the universe is ultimately just a simulation, so the "Physics ...[text shortened]... like looking in the mirror for humanity, however I expect that most will not like what they see.