Numerical significance

Numerical significance

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

p
Patricia

Joined
25 Sep 06
Moves
14447
13 Nov 08

Anyone care to guess the significance of these #'s ?
1111, 1001, 906, 609, 808, 818, 619, 916, 111

t

Joined
05 Jun 07
Moves
906
13 Nov 08

Such numbers are the "same" if read right-side up or up-side down.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
10 Dec 06
Moves
8528
13 Nov 08

Originally posted by twilight2007
Such numbers are the "same" if read right-side up or up-side down.
BOO YA

AH

Joined
26 May 08
Moves
2120
13 Nov 08
6 edits

Here is a harder one (I think): Anyone care to guess the significance of these #'s ?

1048575, 255, 1, 8191

(the order of the numbers is irrelevant)

There is more than one way of answering this depending on how you look at it.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
13 Nov 08

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
Here is a harder one (I think): Anyone care to guess the significance of these #'s ?

1048575, 255, 1, 8191

(the order of the numbers is [b]ir
relevant)

There is more than one way of answering this depending on how you look at it.[/b]
One off 2^n, where n is some integer?

AH

Joined
26 May 08
Moves
2120
13 Nov 08
2 edits

Originally posted by FabianFnas
One off 2^n, where n is some integer?
Correct: (2^n)-1

Also, if you convert any of these numbers to binary numbers, they will consist of all digit 1’s with no digit 0’s.
I find that this is on a very rare occasion useful to know when I am designing my software.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
13 Nov 08

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
Correct: (2^n)-1

Also, if you convert any of these numbers to binary numbers, they will consist of all digit 1’s with no digit 0’s.
I find that this is on a very rare occasion useful to know when I am designing my software.
My assembler programming background helped me a little...

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
15 Nov 08

Here's a nice one. Compute the next one in the row:

1 4 27 3125 16777216

t

Joined
05 Jun 07
Moves
906
16 Nov 08

It would be 11^11, which is approx. 3.028751066x10^14.

A

Joined
02 Mar 06
Moves
17881
16 Nov 08

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Here's a nice one. Compute the next one in the row:

1 4 27 3125 16777216
shouldn't it be 13^13? the elements of the sequence are (n^n) where n is a member of the fibonacci sequence: 1^1, 2^2, 3^3, 5^5, 8^8, ...

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
16 Nov 08
1 edit

Indeed, 13^13

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
16 Nov 08

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Here's a nice one. Compute the next one in the row:

1 4 27 3125 16777216
1 4 27 3125 16777216 302875106592253 5842587018385982521381124421 ...

AH

Joined
26 May 08
Moves
2120
16 Nov 08
3 edits

All these sequences have something simple in common -so what is it and how does each sequence continue? And can you add an example of another sequence to this list?

4, 20…

3, 12, 156, 24492, ….

2, 6, 30, 930, …..

1, 2, …..

0.5, 0.75, 1.3125, ….

0, 0, 0, 0, ….

-0.5, -0.25, -0.1875, …..

-1, 0, …..

-2, 2, ….

-3, 6, …..

-4, 12….

t

Joined
05 Jun 07
Moves
906
16 Nov 08
3 edits

Wow...for some reason I thought 5 + 8 = 11...

Anyways...this problem is difficult since I can't use subscripts, but I'll try my best (and not make a simple mistake).

The pattern is (number)(number+1) = next number. The first numbers are decreasing by one as you go down. The next sequence (down) would be -5, 20, 420, ...

If I'm correct, then the third line is flawed; it should be 2, 6, 42, ...

AH

Joined
26 May 08
Moves
2120
16 Nov 08
1 edit

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton

2, 6, 30, 930, …..
My apologies: as twilight2007 correctly pointed out, this sequence should have been:

2, 6, 42, 1866 ...

and NOT: 2, 6, 30, 930, …..