Limit

Limit

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
28 Jan 04
1 edit

Let f:R^2 --> R be such that for all positive integers N, f(1/N,0) = 1 and f(0,1/N) = -1. Does there exist real L such that f(x,y) --> L as (x,y) --> (0,0)? Prove it.

f
Quack Quack Quack !

Chesstralia

Joined
18 Aug 03
Moves
54533
28 Jan 04
1 edit

Originally posted by royalchicken
Let f:R^2 --> R be such that for all positive integers N, f(1/N,0) = 1 and f(0,1/N) = -1. Does there exist real L such that f(x,y) --> L as (x,y) --> (0,0)? Prove it.
you don't seem to have defined f off the axes - why is this?

as for proof: consider integer N --> big positive.

then f(0,1/N) --> -1

so L must be -1 (if such L exists)

also f(1/N,0) --> 1

so L = 1, contradiction

so no such L,

so f is naughty at (0,0)

(does this have a bigger significance?)

edit for non-maths folks: you get a topographical map. there is a place on this particular map where as you walk towards it from one direction you go up high in the clouds, if you walk towards that same place from a different direction you end up under the sea. a bit like a cliff edge.

r
CHAOS GHOST!!!

Elsewhere

Joined
29 Nov 02
Moves
17317
28 Jan 04

Originally posted by flexmore
you don't seem to have defined f off the axes - why is this?

as for proof: consider integer N --> big positive.

then f(0,1/N) --> -1

so L must be -1 (if such L exists)

also f(1/N,0) --> 1

so L = 1, contradiction

so no such L,

so f is naughty at (0,0)

(does this have a bigger significance?)
It doesn't need to be defined off the axes--it is not completely defined ON the axes, but you are correct.

S
BentnevolentDictater

x10,y45,z-88,t3.1415

Joined
26 Jan 03
Moves
1644
31 Jan 04

Originally posted by royalchicken
Let f:R^2 --> R be such that for all positive integers N, f(1/N,0) = 1 and f(0,1/N) = -1. Does there exist real L such that f(x,y) --> L as (x,y) --> (0,0)? Prove it.
Ok. If a function of L goes to lunch, it pays. Therefore it is broke!😀

How'd I do?