Fat Lady is correct.
Average players get stuck in rut, to some it's a narrow rut, (guilty) to others
it can be broad but sooner or later they hit a ceiling.
To some this ceiling is made of glass and they can smash their way through,
to others it's concrete and they keep bumping their head every time they try.
(though in theory the more they bump their head the thinner the concrete gets.)
If you really want to be a very good player and are willing to put in the time
to study and play in tournaments/league/club matches then it will happen.
Playing and playing and playing is a proven way to improve.
Having on tap a circle of stronger players to feed of will help, you can learn a
lot from honest face to face tuition/comments.
Hi Fat Lady.
"...I'm certainly a 180+ player and feel confident about getting at least a draw
against anyone below International Master level."
Cassia reads this forum mate. She reads every forum, every blog, every book....
You and I have been on the track long enough to know you cannot say that.
You can think it, but you must never put it in print.
And you and I know that you will now come a cropper against some 1600 player
for tempting fate. You may be one Cassia's favourite sons but every now and
then she will clip you around the earhole.
Originally posted by greenpawn34I worded that badly. I didn't mean to imply that I don't have any bad games against lowly rated players. Earlier this season I got completely outplayed by someone in their mid seventies who has a grade of 128 and I was lucky to get a draw. And to rub salt into the wound he lost to someone graded lower than 100 a few days later. Just as we all like to think we are six degrees of separation through won games from beating Kasparov, we are also probably six degrees of separation through lost games from losing to a tub of lard.
"...I'm certainly a 180+ player and feel confident about getting at least a draw
against anyone below International Master level."
Cassia reads this forum mate. She reads every forum, every blog, every book....
You and I have been on the track long enough to know you cannot say that.
You can think it, but you must never put it in print.
And ...[text shortened]... be one Cassia's favourite sons but every now and
then she will clip you around the earhole.
Anyway, what I meant to say was that I feel like I have chances against anyone below International Master level, which certainly wasn't true when I relied entirely on unsound attacks and dodgy sacrifices. I have precious few wins against players graded over 210, but I probably draw more than I lose against that sort of opposition.
I believe psychology plays an important part in chess regardless of what people may say. Even a grandmaster can get beat by a 1500 rated player under the right psychology. The following link shows this happened to GM Walter Browne a few years ago.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/gm-walter-browne-vs-francisco-baltier---the-true-story
I am also a 1500 rated player that has beaten a candidate master years ago. This year on my return to OTB chess I beat a 1900 rated player and loss to a 900 rated player. So one can never be so sure of a win based on chess rating along. One must never underestimate the effects of psychology.
Originally posted by RJHindsplaying cheap tricks is going to do nothing for your chess.
I believe psychology plays an important part in chess regardless of what people may say. Even a grandmaster can get beat by a 1500 rated player under the right psychology. The following link shows this happened to GM Walter Browne a few years ago.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/gm-walter-browne-vs-francisco-baltier---the-true-story
I am als ...[text shortened]... e of a win based on chess rating along. One must never underestimate the effects of psychology.
i find it hard to improve because i have to deeply look at my games and admit i have character traits that stop me improving, it takes a lot to admit your own weaknesses. mine are (character) passive, unagressive thinking and (chess) calculation abilities. its different for all of us. study your own games deeply and very critically(esp the wins!). thats the start to improving, but your character traits are the toughest, imo, to make strong because they are who we are!! i have to constantly remind myself of my character flaws to improve. on studying books , imo, get rid of them opening books! all you need in study books is endgame knowledge.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe Fishing Pole Trap.
The fishing pole variation of the Ruy is a cheap trick!
The top angler on here appears to be ZonaGrad.
He has cast his rod 43 times. Winning 22 games as Black and drawing 4.
A few examples.
jb70 - ZonaGrad RHP 2009
Sometimes not taking the Knight has it's problems.
democrite - ZonaGrad RHP 2009
atlantean - ZonaGrad RHP 2010
Where we see White making up an off the cuff defence which enables him
to take the Knight. Unfortunatley he wants more and goes chasing pawns.
Black misses a simple mate in two but won anyway.
(Pity I could have a used a '...the one that got away gag.'😉
Originally posted by greenpawn34there are not a few games of relatively weaker players giving masters some degree of
The Fishing Pole Trap.
The top angler on here appears to be ZonaGrad.
He has cast his rod 43 times. Winning 22 games as Black and drawing 4.
A few examples.
jb70 - ZonaGrad RHP 2009
[pgn]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Ng4 {The Fishing Pole. A hook is baited and dangled infront of White.} 5. h3 {The natural response.} 5... h5 {The na Nd4 13. Bxg4 Bxg4 14. Qxg4 Qxg4 15. Nxg4 Rxh1+ 16. Kxh1 Nxc2 {Black went on to win.}[/pgn]
trouble with the line GP. I don't know what the refutation is, if there is one, probably
something simple like Nc3, d3 and Bg5 forcing ...f6 and blocking the queens diagonal
and then playing h3 as you hint at in your text.