Where did I go wrong?

Where did I go wrong?

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

M
sorozatgyilkos

leölés ellenfeleim

Joined
15 Jul 06
Moves
40507
15 Aug 07

Game 3893543

Najdorf Sicilian...

After 28. Qxe8

Should I have moved 28. ... Rxe8

Where did I go wrong?

FL

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6830
15 Aug 07

I think White was winning after 27. ... Nc5? Maybe 27. ... Ng3 was a better shot.

z

Joined
13 Apr 06
Moves
2683
15 Aug 07

If I was black maybe 20..Re8 preparing for the Knight on e4 or a Qa7 along move 27 somewhere?

M
sorozatgyilkos

leölés ellenfeleim

Joined
15 Jul 06
Moves
40507
15 Aug 07

Thanks very much for your comments, guys. I'm off to lick my wounds on that game; I don't think I'll be playing him for a bit.

Any further analysis would be very helpful.

Mathurine xxx

t
dragon slayer

Joined
12 Aug 07
Moves
47740
15 Aug 07

Originally posted by Mathurine
Game 3893543

Najdorf Sicilian...

After 28. Qxe8

Should I have moved 28. ... Rxe8

Where did I go wrong?
I think 20... b6 is the final straw giving white a protected pass pawn and a victory in 95% of endgames. Before that the attack on the h-file by the early advancement was too slow and allowed white to form a winning plan of play on the queenside and bury the attack at the same time.
Just my 2cents.

STS

Joined
07 Feb 07
Moves
62961
15 Aug 07

Yer rated 2000+ and you want to know where you went wrong?
Give your prog some more thimking time.

M

Joined
01 Nov 06
Moves
13406
15 Aug 07

You played the English attack but then opted to go off on the queenside. Naturally black counterred in the center and won...

S

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6500
17 Aug 07

I'm slightly puzzled why b6 was not played much earlier. (eg, move 16)

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
17 Aug 07

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Yer rated 2000+ and you want to know where you went wrong?
Give your prog some more thimking time.
Err yes...
The same thought occurred to me. Why not zap it through fritz or whatever & see what happens? There aren't that many people who post on the forums who will be able to help out a 2000 player in need!

M
sorozatgyilkos

leölés ellenfeleim

Joined
15 Jul 06
Moves
40507
17 Aug 07

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
Err yes...
The same thought occurred to me. Why not zap it through fritz or whatever & see what happens? There aren't that many people who post on the forums who will be able to help out a 2000 player in need!
In fact there are some such players who post here. They have been very helpful in the past. Even if I had Fritz I would probably not be able readily to understand why it might choose a particular move, but competent human analysts can explain. It was this type of help I was after. I realize that asking others to analyse my mistakes might be seen as a soft option, and I don't often ask; this game, however, was very tough. I thought carefully about each move, but seemed quickly to get into difficulty. Some of the earlier posts in this thread have already shown me what I could have done better.... for which many thanks to all.

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
17 Aug 07

Originally posted by Mathurine
In fact there are some such players who post here. They have been very helpful in the past. Even if I had Fritz I would probably not be able readily to understand why it might choose a particular move, but competent human analysts can explain. It was this type of help I was after. I realize that asking others to analyse my mistakes ...[text shortened]... is thread have already shown me what I could have done better.... for which many thanks to all.
Unfortunately, I can offer you no help in that game, but I agree with your assessment of human versus computer explanations. All I look to computers for are tactics. Just wait for Fat Lady, David Tebb etc. to notice the game.

A

Joined
02 Feb 07
Moves
394
17 Aug 07
1 edit

I don't claim to be the strongest player on the site, but for what it's worth, here are my thoughts about the game.

In these type of Sicilian positions, it is not an uncommon theme for White to establish a pawn on d5 and then expand on the queenside (as occurred in the game). Sometimes Black is better off taking the Knight on d5 with the Bishop, but I think your 11...Nxd5 is probably correct here. I prefer 13...0-0 over your 13...Rc8 intending one of two plans: a) expansion on the kingside with Bg6 followed by f5 or b) restraint on the queenside with b6 or a5 (since Na5 is pretty powerful for White) followed by Qc7 and Rfc8. By move 20, although White has made progress on the queenside, Black can still put up resistance by keeping the position closed. I don't like your 20...e4 because you are opening up the position while behind in development, so I would go with either Zoot's suggestion of 20...Rfe8 or possibly 20...Nxe2+ followed by moving either Rook to e8. Despite all that, I'm not sure that White took advantage of it in the best way and I think that you could have maintained a perfectly reasonable position with Fat Lady's suggestion of 27...Ng3 instead of your 27...Nc5 which I believe is the critical error of the game.

A

Joined
19 Feb 05
Moves
6190
17 Aug 07

Originally posted by MoneyMaker7
You played the English attack but then opted to go off on the queenside. Naturally black counterred in the center and won...
Did you even look at the game?