The Danger of Underestimating...

The Danger of Underestimating...

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Joined
26 Aug 11
Moves
10242
17 Nov 12

Instead of 18..Rc8;
Can Black save himself if 18..Ne5??


Game 9603682

aka DEFIANT

Joined
29 Nov 06
Moves
90876
21 Nov 12

Never underestimate the power of underestimation!

Joined
26 Aug 11
Moves
10242
22 Nov 12

🙂

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
22 Nov 12
2 edits

Originally posted by jcmessy
🙂
What about R-g8 instead, the idea being, seeing the knight sac threat, you give your king a hidey hole and run instead of taking the knight.


Looking at it again, that loses at least the exchange so I guess not.

So lets modify that idea with R-h8 which now protects the h6 square against the coming queen check.

Joined
26 Aug 11
Moves
10242
22 Nov 12
2 edits

The Danger of Underestimating...
Analysis...Analysis...Analysis... 🙂


Game 9603682

The alternative 18..Rh8 gives white two good continuation:
[A]. The immediate 19. Nxc4 which is good enough for an endgame duel.
[B]. or the more promising
19. Nc6! Bxc6 (forced);
20. dxc6 Nb6 ( The alternative 20..Ne5; is simply meet by 21. f4 Ng4; 22. Nxc4!)
21. Nd5 Na8 (where else?; not 21..Nxd5? because the pawn recapture creates a connected passed pawn.)
22. Qd4! with the immediate threat of 23. Nxf6 isolating d6-pawn, (creating another weakness.)
or just the simple play 23. Qxc4. 🙂 good enough?