strategy vs tactics

strategy vs tactics

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

looking for loot

western colorado

Joined
05 Feb 11
Moves
9664
07 Mar 18

Strategy vs tactics. What when why how? My opinion is tactics wins, you know, push comes to shove. I rely on strategy, so I'm not happy.

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
42492
07 Mar 18

There is the Dwight D. Eisenhower quote:

"In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable."

You make a strategic plan to guide you but soon it will be
out of the window as you have to deal with a or impose a
tactical threat. Hopefully your pieces will be, due the strategic
plan, on the right squares to deal with it.

Joined
06 Nov 15
Moves
41301
10 Mar 18

Originally posted by @greenpawn34
There is the Dwight D. Eisenhower quote:

"In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable."

You make a strategic plan to guide you but soon it will be
out of the window as you have to deal with a or impose a
tactical threat. Hopefully your pieces will be, due the strategic
plan, on the right squares to deal with it.
A good strategy: Plan to adapt to tactics.

Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3091
11 Mar 18

Originally posted by @apathist
Strategy vs tactics. What when why how? My opinion is tactics wins, you know, push comes to shove. I rely on strategy, so I'm not happy.
Yes, tactics is very important. Regarding the What when why how? I would add another very important concept to these: Effort! The strongest players are also the ones who work hard at endgames, tactics, their opening repertoire etc.

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8308
11 Mar 18

Kasparov once said that playing a game of chess is like trying to paint a masterpiece while someone is tugging at your sleeve.

Many of Lasker's games exhibit a particular kind of mastery, that of carrying out long-range strategic maneuvers by means of immediate tactical threats. For example, provoking a weakness in the opponent's king position or obtaining a passer, by threatening or attacking something which the opponent must parry. Of course the threat can be parried, but the point is that the opponent must do so and is thereby prevented from doing something else which might have improved his position instead of weakening it.

Joined
06 Nov 15
Moves
41301
11 Mar 18

Originally posted by @moonbus
Kasparov once said that playing a game of chess is like trying to paint a masterpiece while someone is tugging at your sleeve.

Many of Lasker's games exhibit a particular kind of mastery, that of carrying out long-range strategic maneuvers by means of immediate tactical threats. For example, provoking a weakness in the opponent's king position or obtaini ...[text shortened]... vented from doing something else which might have improved his position instead of weakening it.
I love that Kasparov quote!

Especially as a patzer...I am forever required to slop paint upon the vinyl canvas. 😉

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8308
11 Mar 18
2 edits

Well, at least you get it on the canvas instead of your shirt.