Refusal to draw?

Refusal to draw?

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

ZG

Joined
09 Oct 08
Moves
1831
31 Oct 08

Okay the position in this game is clearly a draw. But my opponent refuses to accept one. And there is no where to move. Since the pawns prevent any movement. What should I do? I don't think this is appropriate. Game 5586608

s

Joined
25 Mar 07
Moves
66132
31 Oct 08

At the risk of commenting on a game in progress....

there is the "40 moves without a capture" rule

t

Joined
17 Feb 08
Moves
6797
31 Oct 08

isn't it 50?

b
Enigma

Seattle

Joined
03 Sep 06
Moves
3298
31 Oct 08

Originally posted by Zhong Guo
Okay the position in this game is clearly a draw. But my opponent refuses to accept one. And there is no where to move. Since the pawns prevent any movement. What should I do? I don't think this is appropriate. Game 5586608
I understand your problem. You may wish to contact Red Hot Pawn and ask there advise in this situation. In the meantime I'd keep playing! Don't let this ill mannered person defeat you.
😏

Erro Ergo Sum

In the Green Room

Joined
09 Jul 07
Moves
524738
31 Oct 08

>It certainly is a draw and your opponent is indeed ill-mannered by continuing to play it out and declining a draw offer, but he does have a right to play on.
>That's one reason why there is the 50-move rule. Eventually it must kick in, so just keep playng and keep an eye on the scoresheet and claim the draw once 50 moves have been made without a capture or a pawn move.
>After that, add the opponent to your avoid list. In fact, add him right now.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
31 Oct 08

Now I don't comment any game in progress. This is only information about rules, and how they are applied here at RHP:

Yes, there is a 50-move rule. If no pawn has moved, if no pieces have been taken, if a castling has not been done within 50 moves, there is a ground for 'claim a draw'. This draw is accepted automatically by the system, no involvement by your opponent.

There is also a position repetition rule. If a certain same position repeats itself 3 times there is also ground for 'claim a draw' as described above. Note that these three positions don't need to be in a row, they can be many moves in between.

None of these moves is done automatically, you have to 'claim draw'. If the draw is correct, then you get it without further qeustions by the system nor your opponent.

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
31 Oct 08

Your opponent has the right to play on, and given the blunders (on both sides) made before in the game, he can even hope on winning! If you can't convince him to accept draw (if that's what you want), then just play on within the rules (50 moves, repetition, ...).

S

Dublin

Joined
07 Feb 05
Moves
8227
31 Oct 08

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Yes, there is a 50-move rule. If no pawn has moved, if no pieces have been taken, if a castling has not been done within 50 moves, there is a ground for 'claim a draw'.
I've never heard of castling being included in the 50 move rule, just captures and pawn moves.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
31 Oct 08

Originally posted by Schumi
I've never heard of castling being included in the 50 move rule, just captures and pawn moves.
You're right. Castling is not included in the 50-move-rule. Sorry.

But it is in the repetition rule...

T
Mr T

I pity the fool!

Joined
22 Jan 05
Moves
22874
31 Oct 08

Offer him a draw on every single move for the rest of the game. He should get the hint after a while.

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
31 Oct 08

Originally posted by Zhong Guo
Okay the position in this game is clearly a draw. But my opponent refuses to accept one. And there is no where to move. Since the pawns prevent any movement. What should I do? I don't think this is appropriate. Game 5586608
One of the advantages of subscribing is that you don't have to bother about finishing games like this because you can just start as many as you would like.

Think about it. 🙂

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
31 Oct 08

I guess we really shouldn't comment, but if there's ever a candidate for the exception to the GIP rule, it's this. Unless white moves the f pawn there is no possibility of either side winning, but I guess white could move the f pawn, so it's white's right to play on.

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
31 Oct 08

I don't know if this is a no no but white could have done better on move 39... but yeah this is a draw.

t

Joined
15 Jun 06
Moves
16334
31 Oct 08

Originally posted by sh76
I guess we really shouldn't comment, but if there's ever a candidate for the exception to the GIP rule, it's this. Unless white moves the f pawn there is no possibility of either side winning, but I guess white could move the f pawn, so it's white's right to play on.
White is the one offering draws.

h

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
9221
31 Oct 08

I would just play it. Of course we can't comment but you can ask after the game and you might get a different response. It's his/her right to play until the rules of chess force a finish. If you subscribe you could just play it out and have plenty of more games to keep you busy.
Good Luck.