Pawns end knights endgame

Pawns end knights endgame

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

i
SelfProclaimedTitler

Joined
06 Feb 06
Moves
23543
28 Jan 09
2 edits

Again FICS 😛

I am interested if my side was meant to fail right from the, say 33 move ? Did I miscaculated the position from that move ? So close to draw, yet so FAIL

s

Joined
02 Jul 08
Moves
75
29 Jan 09

Just had a brief look and you can probably draw just by heading to the k-side (Ke4-f5-e6-f7) instead of trying to shepherd the b-pawn home with Kc3 etc.(too slow when he has an e-pawn ready to run).

If he tries to stop the king getting through by playing ...g6, then g4-g5 should do the trick. I might be missing someting though-it's late and I didn't analyse it in great depth.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
29 Jan 09

Originally posted by streetfighter
Just had a brief look and you can probably draw just by heading to the k-side (Ke4-f5-e6-f7) instead of trying to shepherd the b-pawn home with Kc3 etc.(too slow when he has an e-pawn ready to run).

If he tries to stop the king getting through by playing ...g6, then g4-g5 should do the trick. I might be missing someting though-it's late and I didn't analyse it in great depth.
Looks to me like a draw too for the same reason.

Interesting lesson from that game. A king has more offensive value in the endgame than a knight. you put your King way out of position to force him to sac his knight and once he did, his King was in a much stronger position. If you would have stayed on the King side, the b pawn would have fallen, but it would have been his king that was out of position.