Morgski and Me

Morgski and Me

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
20 Jun 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
Bf4 would be a blunder in this position. GP34's move is best.

The Instructor
how can the bishop sac itself with a knight on e5 you zoob?

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
20 Jun 13
1 edit

Originally posted by Tygert
Bishop sac alert. 😕
see above. 🙄

m

In attack

Joined
02 Mar 06
Moves
30142
21 Jun 13

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
see above. 🙄
I think they thought you were suggesting one of those 4 moves, rather than a sequence of moves...
Bf4 is pretty weak as the first move with that board 😉

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
21 Jun 13
2 edits

Originally posted by morgski
I think they thought you were suggesting one of those 4 moves, rather than a sequence of moves...
Bf4 is pretty weak as the first move with that board 😉
you think. Perhaps they are used to simply thinking in terms of one move sequences, hard to explain it in any other terms. The counter intuitive Na3 (not blocking the bishop), Ne5 and Bf4 look good to me

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Jun 13

Originally posted by morgski
I think they thought you were suggesting one of those 4 moves, rather than a sequence of moves...
Bf4 is pretty weak as the first move with that board 😉
That sequence would not work either.

The Instructor

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Jun 13

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you think. Perhaps they are used to simply thinking in terms of one move sequences, hard to explain it in any other terms. The counter intuitive Na3 (not blocking the bishop), Ne5 and Bf4 look good to me
That depends on what Black does, Spanky.

The Instructor