Originally posted by KorchNo, last time I checked noone had refuted the KID, I'd be surprised if someone did. That does not disable anyone from pointing out its weaknesses or skepsis - even at the highest level. It is their judgement, and I agree with it.
Can these GM`s refute this opening? While they cant do it, then I`ll think that this opening is playable.
Originally posted by GolubSkepticism of the KID based on what analysis? 😕
No, last time I checked noone had refuted the KID, I'd be surprised if someone did. That does not disable anyone from pointing out its weaknesses or skepsis - even at the highest level. It is their judgement, and I agree with it.
The French is absolutely fine, of course, but the Poison Pawn Vars. of the Winawer is getting a very good test in the in-progress Akizy-Weyerstrass game.
Originally posted by GolubI dont take serious only scepticism whitout something more concrete.
No, last time I checked noone had refuted the KID, I'd be surprised if someone did. That does not disable anyone from pointing out its weaknesses or skepsis - even at the highest level. It is their judgement, and I agree with it.
Originally posted by WulebgrThats a bit too much of a generalisation especially when you consider that the main reasons John Watson dropped the poisoned pawn winawer and 3... Nf6 Tarrasch from the latest edition of "Play the French" was because they had been almost analysed to death.
But, the French is played by people that don't have time to study books and databases. It is not theory laden, like the Sicilian and Spanish (where one must know lines 20 moves deep). It is simple and straightforward. Yet, white players fear it. It's as if black is saying, "I'm okay with a draw." And white, in fear, offer equality. I think that's why they lo ...[text shortened]... is okay. Concede equality on move three, and black has already won the psychological game.
Although I do agree that generally the spanish, sicilian and KID have been analysed almost to extinction!!!